how long?

>>30314302
I don't think that they particularly care anon

Already cried over optics


That scope that did calculations for you, some dems were calling for a ban

>nobody needs a sniper rifle that shoots for you!

>>30314339
All that butthurt about ballistic computer scopes was from hunters and the like who didn't like the idea of rich people from outta state sniping dem dar durr from 2km away.

Libfags don't know anything about optics on guns and its hard to really sell the idea that they make the assault-style murderguns that much worse.

>>30314319
They tried shortly after the turn of the century. Never got traction. Doubt it ever will.

The tried to ban "sniper scopes" over 10 power 'cause a hunter doesn't need that kind of magnification.

>>30314735
did this really happen

>>30314302
Might not be too long, if the book Enemies Foreign and Domestic is any indication. Any scoped rifle being deemed a deadly sniper rifle would be next in line after another AWB

>>30317762
Can't wait till they ban actual clips then, and lever action guns and hell why not revolvers and other historic assault firearm from other times .
Ban everything

>>30317867
I'll just wait until they start to ban knowledge.
That when the fun begins anon, just like in the dark ages.

>>30317880
Feinstein for vp?

Tis but a scratch