How strong is China?

>>30288553
about three fiddy

Considering they beat the shit out of us in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, I'd say pretty fucking strong.

They have a metric ton of troops but almost no means of force projection. So in China: Really strong. Anywhere else: Not strong.

The difference between the Chinese military from 2000 to now is like night and day.

>>30288570
wat

>>30288570
Getting slaughtered by MGS and pushed back to their border=beating the shit out of us? Everyone in the middle east getting dumped on by US=China stronk?

>>30288602
Getting kicked out of their border zone, and then kicked out of the most oil wealthy region in the world = China Stronk

>>30288553
Worlds largest population, 2nd largest economy and 2nd highest military spending = pretty fucking strong.

>>30288553
Way too strong to be easily threatened by any other nation on the planet. Still not strong enough to project power outside of it's region.

>>30288570
t. chink diaspora

>>30288553
They are strong military, but we wont see a war with China in the next hundred years...

Fucking globalism killed even fun wars, now every country is so depent of another one that a war is almost impossible.

>>30288553
>That obvious shop

reeee

>How strong is China?

Compared to its neighbors?

Strong.

Compared to America?

Not no where near strong enough.

Should we start saying that less people would have died if he had used an ar15? 300 blackout is a bigger boolit. I think the normies would buy it

>>30289295
This isnt the thread i meant to post in

File: 1333211748220.jpg (363KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 1280x853px

>>30288553
USA> powergap >China ≈ Russia > everyone else.
Not to say they aren't powerful but they could kick the shit out of most countries.

>>30289354
Does it actually have any radar?

>>30288553
>>30288570
>>30289322
>>30289354

CHINA PREASE

Longest retreat in US military history


To date

>>30289373
>China ≈ Russia
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeh.

How good are they in espionage and cyber warfare?

>>30289400
You are correct, it should be China > powergap > Russia.

>>30288553
They've had no real combat experience since the Korean War.
Checkmate.

>>30289391
Then, like pretty much every Chinese war, they shit the bed at the last moment and pretty much lost all their progress.

>>30289439
Eeeeeeeeeeeh.

>>30288553
>ramps

all you need to know

>>30288553
TAIWAN #1!!!!!

I really REALLY wish the US, China, and Russia would stop dick waving, put aside their differences, and form a god tier alliance.

The idea of burger, vodka, and wonton removing kebab would be god damn orgasmic.

>>30289373
>USA> powergap >China ≈ Russia > everyone else.

Define "strong", only US, France and the UK have global power projection.

>>30289530
Imagine he's talking about raw military force rather than force projection.

>>30289539
> raw military force
US = Russia >>> rest of the nuclear club >>>>>>>>>>> rest of the world. Because nukes.

That's why "raw military power" is not a very good scale.

>>30289446
Nah man, they invaded vietnam in the late 70's. But they did get their asses kicked.

>>30289570
Now do it again without the nukes maybe?

>>30289570
>USA> powergap >China ≈ Russia > everyone else.

Fix'd that for ya.

>>30289606
Doing it again without nukes maybe implies that we're gonna play it WWII war of attrition style, which is a concept 90 times more fantastic than a nuclear war.

>nuh let's imagine it's a hueg insurrection
Israel > Russia = China > US > rest of NATO

>nnah let's imagine it's literally Gulf War
US >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rest of NATO >>> Russia >>>> China.

File: eeeeeeeeeh.jpg (26KB, 289x246px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 289x246px

>>30289683
Eeeeeeeeeeh.

>>30288553
not very strong considering you can break it by dropping it on the floor

>>30289727
Russia has more nukes both active and in storage....shouldn't they be on top and U.S be second? The United Kingdom should be last :c. And what about other countries that have nukes? LIKE IRAN?

>>30289322
>>30289354
prease reave

>>30289780
>Russia has more nukes both active and in storage....shouldn't they be on top and U.S be second
That's not a significant difference.
P A R I T Y
A
R
I
T
Y

>>30289780
Iran has nukes? I thought they barely scraped a bomb or two.
When did they get a proper ballistic missile program?

>>30289780
>:c.

Kill yourself.

File: 1461441643379.jpg (21KB, 540x360px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 540x360px

>>30288553
stronk

File: 1463773927598.jpg (61KB, 600x602px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 600x602px

>>30289267

>>30289322
dat collapsible stock

>>30288572
>>30289249
>>30289446
>>30289530

These are the true statements in the thread. Ignore the rest.

>>30289391
Pretty sure the retreat down Luzon to Corregidor was longer.

File: image.jpg (29KB, 211x246px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 211x246px

>>30288570
>Vietnam
>Iraq
>Afghanistan

>>30289262
ABC here, Chicoms are faggots and deserve a mercury enema.

File: I.jpg (1MB, 3380x1763px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3380x1763px

>boo hoo hoo
>China scary
>gif me more tax monie

U.S. is already big enough that china couldn't make a single dent.
maybe Russia we should afraid

>>30292653
This is a shop right?
The idea of having that amount of valuable hardware in a single, fuck able, locations pisses me off.

>>30292836
One nuke and all of that isn't even good for scrap.

>>30292653
Giimmie da monnie boss

>>30288570

uh, what

>>30293259
One nuke and all of China isn't even good for scrap.

>>30289524
where's the money in that?

>>30292653

Do you want another pearl harbor because pics like this will make it happen.

>>30290071
they could probably get them from russia or north korea or russia shipping north korean missiles to iran

>>30293259
one nuke and whoever set it off is glassed.

File: image.png (307KB, 494x487px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 494x487px

>>30292653
Pearl harbour 2.0

>>30293355
another pearl harbor is literally impossible with modern technology

>>30293313
>it is now

>>30288553
Paper Tiger. Don't even have a joint command and the last time the PLA saw combat was 30 years ago.

>>30289485
>second rate russian ramps

fixed

>>30288570
>China beat afghanistan
>implying china didnt just fund the mujahideen like the US did to keep russia from taking the oil

>>30294120
>No joint command.
>Everything is PLA.
If anything, not having a joint command would be a nightmare for PRChina.

Its whole military system was set up so as not to have a repeat of 1916.

>>30290096
>when the Taiwanese hits hard

>>30288553
Get a piece of paper.


Draw a kitty on it.


Add fangs.


Done.

>>30295217
>>30294120
>Paper tiger was invented by the Chinese to describe Russia/America.

WEAK. Low energy baby's like these are SAD!

>>30290396
Thanks

>>30289354
Jesus Christ, did they make that in the same factories where they make plastic toys? thing looks like it couldn't beat a strong gust of wind let alone a competent opponent.

>>30289530
Ahhh yes Russia is totally not bombing the fuck out of Syria right now with 80 planes.

>>30290396
China has fought multiple wars since Korea.

Or course, that doesn't make for good anti-Chinese bait though.

>>30294120
The biggest piece of recent news was the creation of a joint command last year in China.

>>30295405
No.

How retards on /k/ think things look != how things are

>How strong is China?

The only countries they can push around are Vietnam and the Philippines and not surprisingly they have shit militaries.

They don't even show the same amount of fervour and enthusiasm against America, India, Japan or even Taiwan. That alone tells you A LOT.

If the two countries above had a passable military China would be on absolute suicide watch.

>>30289428
this, the new battlefield is behind the scenes

>>30295773
>They don't even show the same amount of fervour and enthusiasm against America, India, Japan or even Taiwan. That alone tells you A LOT.

They've fought three wars with India, four conflicts with Taiwan, and continously harass the Japanese.

You being ignorant of history != China not fucking with its more powerful neighbors.

>>30289267
The exact quote was said of the two world wars.

File: navycarrier1.jpg (627KB, 4288x2848px) Image search: [Google]

627KB, 4288x2848px

>>30288553
Your image is photoshopped, mine is not. That speaks volumes about the relative power

>>30295833
Got a source on that?

>>30288553
They have no Battleships = their navy is all for show.

>>30295833
You're quelling a peasant revolt with nerve gas when this guy shows up and slaps your Imam's ass. What do you do?

>>30288553
Keeping in size scale with that photo, you'd need an image over 40,000 pixels wide and 3,000 pixels high to display America's naval and air power.

China is punk-bitch tier.

>>30295833
Wish they could of had two subs jumping out.