Picking a handgun

>>30203564

all three are terrible.

PPQ, P320, 9mm FNS should be your choices. i have a P320 but i'd be OK with any of the 3

>>30203579

For $340 is a good deal though no?

>>30203579
>P250
>Terrible

Found the guy who can't control a trigger.

OP, the P250 is incredible. Get it. Love it.

Have original series P250 compact, dig it. My EDC piece. P320 is the shiznit. Get that.

>>30203609
Found the guy who bought a p250 right before the p320 was announced.

>>30203609
same one guy who gets triggered every p250 thread

File: nfmH4mu.jpg (73KB, 453x604px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 453x604px

Not OP but I'm also trying to decide between my very first pistol
Should I get an m&p 9 or a CZ 75b?
pic unrelated

>>30204161
both

>>30203564
Between those, I've shot the 250 and the ppx and would recommend the ppx. The double action of the 250 is well, a very good double action but the ppx trigger simply is a much better trigger and will help you be your most accurate, particularly if you try to shoot fast or under stress. The sig does share the frame of the 320 and as the 320 increases in popularity, you may see more market share for the holsters. I do not know.

As for the FNS-40, looking solely at the ammo itself, it's going to be more expensive to shoot. I absolutely love .40, LOVE IT, but if you want to make frequent trips to the range, the added cost of ammo per visit is kind of a downer and 9mm is just about as good.

I'd get the ppx

>>30204175
I plan on getting both eventually, I just need to choose what to get first

File: lima5.jpg (38KB, 1000x600px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 1000x600px

>>30203564

Get a Sig 320, basically a striker 250, which is what it should have been in the first place.

You'd also then have access to this.

>>30203745
>>30204131
Not him but the 250 does have the smoothest DAO trigger I know of and virtually no break point at all. I'm with you though, 250 ads a lot of room for user error. I wouldn't call it "bad" though.

>>30203564
the 250 is junk

Noone here seems to have an opinion on the FNS-40 besides the ammo being expensive :/

>>30203564
>>30204208
Agree with this guy. PPX is great, trigger is amazing for the price. Also probably the cheapest of the bunch.

So Sig vs FN... what is better quality?

>>30204681

Depends on the two guns you want to compare.

>>30203564
why the fns40 and not fns9?

>>30203579
+1 for the FNS. I got the long slide because Canadian and it feels pretty good. How is the P320? That was actually my first choice, but the FNS was a bit cheaper and came in two-tone.

File: P_20160602_221120.jpg (3MB, 4096x3072px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4096x3072px

>>30204741

Its what's being offered as a trade for my Sig

>>30204161
I pick M&P, I just don't like CZs.

>>30203579
First post best post.

>>30203564
>>30204750
I'm not a fan of .40. Given the other two options then, I would personally rather have a PPX than P250 because of the lighter trigger and I think it looks better. Not like you asked a 3 year old to "draw a gun." But that's pretty superficial I mean both will be reliable and accurate and serve you will, they are quality guns from quality manufacturers.