Is the C7 a good rifle?

>>30035712
>>30035712
>>30035712
No, M16A2 is superior in every possible way.

It's a great rifle.

>>30035712
It's well made
The syrup optic on it is shit. Specifically external adjustments and the mounting system. The glass is nice

>>30035730
It's LITERALLY an M16, just built for cold weather.

I loved the C7A1, which doesn't have the mall ninja shit that ops does. I used to dislike ARs but being forced to carry one around all day gave me a stockholm syndrome appreciation for it.

>>30035792
It's probably because the AR-15 is a genuinely good design, the C7 being a good variant of it.

File: arulco_map_legend.jpg (205KB, 724x624px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 724x624px

>>30035712
It's pretty baller in JA 2 1.13.

>>30035712
IUR never

>>30035743
>It's LITERALLY an M16, just built for cold weather.

No, it's not.

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/09/30/canadian-c7-different-m16/

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2011/10/12/guest-post-the-canadian-forces-c7a2-upgrade/

>>30035740
Its not that bad, its an ELCAN and they're pretty well know for fighting optics. The only issue is the picture you get the post is a little strange but it works well.

>>30036014
So literally an M16 built for cold weather? Different barrel metallurgy, a skinnier hand guard and an ambi selector does not a new gun make.

The Danes seem to like them

>>30035830
>getting the G11 in JA2 UB 1.13
>burst mode every time

C7 is great since its starts with an optic. Although the L85A2 have slightly better stats and also comes with an optic as well.

Good times.