Which one for 9mm SBR?

If you're not willing to shell out the bux for a T1 Micro, go with Primary Arms. Vortex is good too but PA is cheaper and nearly just as good.

Vortex. Only so the PA if you get the good one that everyone recommends.

File: IMG_20160508_103141.jpg (13KB, 320x165px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 320x165px

>>29919778
I would love to get a T1 but yeah after the two tax stamps for this weapon... If PA is "good enough" I'll use it for a while.

File: IMG_0256.jpg (1MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4032x3024px

>buying poorfag optics

lol

>>29919822
So helpful thanks

>>29919809
What good one?

I have a Sparc II and it's pretty great for the money, plus Vortex's warranty is the best. I got my Sparc for $150 and I think it's worth that. Your pic is a bit more expensive but I'd still recommend it.

>>29919822
>poorfag optics
>messy computer cabinet.

HA

>>29919843
Ya got me

>>29919822
This.

>"Guise, I paid $2,000,000 for this SBR with a suppressor and waited 9 months, now I am going to put a nigger-tier optic on it ... you know ... the part of the weapon that shouldn't be chinsed on. Amirite guise? LOL!!!"

Since we're talking optics: I can't use red dots because they are blurry as fuck due to astigmatism. Will I have the same issue on holos?

The optic or sight is your primary means of aiming and effectively placing shots on target.

If you're willing to spend thousands of dollars on a rifle and tax stamps, why would you cheap out on the optic? It just doesn't make sense. Just save your money and buy the best thing you can.

File: Screenshot_2016-05-12-02-07-59.png (122KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 720x1280px

>>29919873
Yeah OK. Happy now? I decided not to nigout on this.

>>29919909
Good job

>>29919894
Have you tried with magnification?

>>29919930
Doesn't help much oddly enough. I can see well enough, don't need glasses to drive or anything, but red dots are just fiery blobs. I'm hoping eotechs don't have the same issue for me, but I don't know anyone with one.

I don't get why all you guys argue about optic quality when it comes to red dots. A 2 MOA red dot that costs $600 will not make you more accurate than a $150 2 MOA red dot. It's a literal dot for fucks sake, it isn't some long distance piece of glass.

I've owned top of the line red dots and I've owned $50 chinkshit red dots. If you can't hit your target with a low tier 2 MOA dot, spending $600 isn't going to make you any better.

You faggots will argue about anything.


>this does not apply to distance glass, specifically dot sights.

>>29919926
I just needed a little push. It's not been 2,000,000 bux but the wife is getting posed lol. Today the thread adapter came and she was all "still spending money?". I'm like " yeah, but I'm doing it quietly "

>>29919950
Yeah my thought too, but the t1 is always on for years ready to go. Good hold on zero is important to, I don't want to have to re-zero.

>>29919947
In afraid that eotech will be worse for you, 65moa blob. Get a 3x pistol scope.