[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Helicopter thread

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 37
Thread images: 23

File: AH-64E_3.jpg (247KB, 1000x540px) Image search: [Google]
AH-64E_3.jpg
247KB, 1000x540px
For whatever reason, I have developed an infatuation with helicopters recently. Post helicopters (doesn't matter what type). Argue about which is best. (Ospreys too, I don't care if they're technically not helicopters) Discuss them so that I can absorb your knowledge.

>Primer question: AH-64E, yes or no?
>>
File: ka52.jpg (38KB, 620x395px) Image search: [Google]
ka52.jpg
38KB, 620x395px
>>
>>29914267
>>Primer question: AH-64E
You had me at yes
>>
File: 1461157977105.webm (3MB, 426x240px) Image search: [Google]
1461157977105.webm
3MB, 426x240px
>>
File: AH-64_07.jpg (304KB, 1500x1003px) Image search: [Google]
AH-64_07.jpg
304KB, 1500x1003px
NAVALISED
>>
File: 00004253.Bell.AH-1Z.Viper.jpg (925KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]
00004253.Bell.AH-1Z.Viper.jpg
925KB, 1920x1200px
>>29914765

Step away you fat black bitch.
>>
>>29914765

How do you "Navalize" a helicopter?

Moreover, why haven't the Marines been using Apaches?
>>
Didn't wanna save the pic, here's an IDF Apache firing a missile.

http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.697157.1452672070!/image/1412475583.jpg_gen/derivatives/headline_609x343/1412475583.jpg
>>
>>29914926
Widening the landing gear, and harden it. Build components out of non-corrosive parts.
>>
File: IMG_5375.jpg (266KB, 2736x1824px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_5375.jpg
266KB, 2736x1824px
>>29914267
I have quite a few photo of the Rooivalk and other South African Helicopters that I shoot while at the Feb military week in Port Elizabeth.

https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipML9sZduANWrZrYxqbF6TdDRH1A6J_HDcm8zO5mLvclUaW7NRpwGnzwTG6-2ISihg?key=YUxBRlBiUGVOOHZoTUhueDNpSE4wMldTUVZtNVVR
>>
File: IMG_5340.jpg (296KB, 2736x1824px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_5340.jpg
296KB, 2736x1824px
>>29914267
>>
>>
File: Mi-28.jpg (1MB, 1500x1012px) Image search: [Google]
Mi-28.jpg
1MB, 1500x1012px
>>
File: Hind.jpg (426KB, 2048x1492px) Image search: [Google]
Hind.jpg
426KB, 2048x1492px
>>
File: Hind & Apache BFF.jpg (714KB, 2850x1860px) Image search: [Google]
Hind & Apache BFF.jpg
714KB, 2850x1860px
>>
File: 1310907388147.jpg (253KB, 1600x1065px) Image search: [Google]
1310907388147.jpg
253KB, 1600x1065px
>>
File: image.jpg (372KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
372KB, 1280x960px
Apachebro here, threads off to a good start.
>>
File: Blackhawk troops.jpg (437KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]
Blackhawk troops.jpg
437KB, 1920x1200px
>>29916113
Are Apache's not NBC sealed?
>>
>>29916133
The short answer is not totally.
>>
File: ch-53e_040726-m-5538e-065.jpg (109KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]
ch-53e_040726-m-5538e-065.jpg
109KB, 800x533px
>>29914267

So if the CH-53 can travel further than the Osprey, and carry more than the Osprey, then what purpose does the Osprey even serve?
>>
File: AH-1Z.jpg (732KB, 3000x1994px) Image search: [Google]
AH-1Z.jpg
732KB, 3000x1994px
>>
File: 1434242487356.jpg (4MB, 3000x2357px) Image search: [Google]
1434242487356.jpg
4MB, 3000x2357px
>>29916157
Osprey is faster and has a 50% longer range.
>>
>>29916194

V-22 combat radius: 390 nm

CH-53 combat radius: 460 nm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_CH-53K_King_Stallion#Specifications_.28CH-53K.29

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Boeing_V-22_Osprey
>>
File: 1361317178216.png (1MB, 1026x685px) Image search: [Google]
1361317178216.png
1MB, 1026x685px
>>29916290
Um, no.

Range
V-22B: 879 nmi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Boeing_V-22_Osprey

CH-53E: 540 nmi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_CH-53E_Super_Stallion
>>
>>29916290
You quoted the CH-53's range as its combat radius, even though it says its combat radius a few lines down.

(110 nmi)
>>
>>29916194
God I love my country
>>
>>29914926
Money,just like everything else in the Corps as it pertains to having shitty hand me down Army gear. They just don't get the same funding. Also has to do with the fact that the Cobra and also the Huey are already certified for being exposed to saltwater for long periods of time, whereas the UH-60 and AH-64 have not.
>>
>>29916762
>uh60 hasn't been near saltwater for an extended period of time
Uh the navy uses them....
>>
>>29916652

If you love it because of the shitefest that is the eurotigre then your love is misplaced my son.
>>
>>29916762
Everything the Marines use costs more to operate than the Army

>>29916194
>>29916458
Thats flying at high altitude with zero load
You put the osprey with a load, flying at low altitude(its not pressurized), and the advantages start to disappear
>>
File: AH-1W.png (72KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]
AH-1W.png
72KB, 275x183px
I love the AH-1W, although they are getting quite old, they are pretty simple to work on, at least on the powerplant and drivetrain side of things. They swashplate throws a shit ton of grease, and they tend to leak a lot more than the UH-1Y. Pretty soon the Z will be the norm for the Marine Corps though, and we will never hear the Wop-Wop again :(.
>>
hind memes?
>>
>>29914926
From what I've seen, naval aircraft usually have the ability to have their main rotors folded or otherwise stowed to take up less room on the ship. When the Army landed Apaches on the flight deck, it usually confused the Sailors, because they couldn't be folded, they couldn't find the mooring points for chaining, etc. As a result, the Apaches took up a shitton of deckspace and the main rotors were flopping pretty hard in the wind.

It was pretty funny to watch the Navy try to figure out that shit.
>>
File: indian tribe.jpg (1009KB, 2257x1612px) Image search: [Google]
indian tribe.jpg
1009KB, 2257x1612px
>>29914267
>>Primer question: AH-64E, yes or no?

yes
>>
File: JGSDF_OH-1_(32634)_in_Camp_Yao.jpg (3MB, 4240x2400px) Image search: [Google]
JGSDF_OH-1_(32634)_in_Camp_Yao.jpg
3MB, 4240x2400px
>>29914843
>>
Bump.
>>
File: mi-8amtsh (12).jpg (215KB, 1200x648px) Image search: [Google]
mi-8amtsh (12).jpg
215KB, 1200x648px
Thread posts: 37
Thread images: 23


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.