88 or 75

Neither are the meme one... Why does one have to be a "Lel meme" one? You're a faggot

File: 1459814685584.png (601KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

601KB, 1920x1080px

>>29809201
They were both sufficient for their intended roles.

>>29809201
i swear you retards have no idea what meme means anymore

>>29809201
They were both shit

>>29809201
Stugg was best tank and also best meme tank.

>>29809788
It has a secondary definition now. Get with the times brah.

>>29809201

the 88 was the good one, the 75 was a meme.

they both had similar penetration but the 88 would cause more damage.

>>29809931

Neither were a 'meme' you fucking autist.

Both had different roles that they filled well enough in terms of armament. Panther was a Medium tank, Tiger a heavy. Armament was appropriate for their classification.

Stop saying 'meme' like it actually means something.

88
because it sounds nazi.

File: 1418408198250.jpg (286KB, 1200x789px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1200x789px

The 88 was probably more effective for infantry support, otherwise the 75 was superior in anti tank warfare, due to more penetration and higher shell velocity.

>>29809931
75 was great for AT purposes, though lacking in the HE department. Still both good guns.

Hachi Hachi wa shit

I played Panther 2 in WoT and it was shit.

>>29810282
I played WoT and it was shit.

I remember reading somewhere that allied tankers feared the Panther's gun more. Was it real or urban myth, that I don't know.

File: 1996-Panther-37.jpg (100KB, 1022x504px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1022x504px

>>29809201
Both were good, autists who sperg saying that one is a "meme" are retards who don't know what they're talking about.

>>29809788
Now meme also seems to mean "popular thing that is shit."

Oh wait, no, the definition appears to be the same.

>>29809201
Both could kill any tank of the war just fine, but the 88 had an actually good HE round.

File: 1268113594113.jpg (39KB, 800x569px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 800x569px

GERMAN SCHHTEEEEEL

>>29809765
The long 75 on the Panther was not sufficient for its intended role. The HE load was too small and so it struggled to deal with infantry.

>>29809765
>They were both sufficient for their intended roles.
Which was losing the war

>>29809931
But the 75 still had better penetration characteristics at range. On top of that it could be fitted on a tank with a smaller turret ring than the 88 and required less time and resources to be manufactured than the 88 was.

File: 1437105304258.jpg (100KB, 680x583px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 680x583px

>>29810419
>Oh wait, no, the definition appears to be the same.