Question for /k/

No idea man, but I wanna know.

>>29784466
It is irritating, I've read wikipedia and watched a few vidoes and it seems like a really interesting little fellow. It would fit excentlly into what they're doing with the armata. There must be a good reason behind it not being at the forefront of their parades and all.

>>29784487
From what I've read, apparently it was more expensive and less versatile. While the former makes senser, the latter doesn't. The intention of the vehicle was to adapt to situations needed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-LXLwrIR-U
Oh hey, it actually is in use.

File: BF2SF_Vodnik.png (1MB, 1360x500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1360x500px

>>29784443

It was a sweet ride in BF2.

File: jF2z3tg[1].jpg (362KB, 2250x1500px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 2250x1500px

>>29784443
Tigr-M seems to meet their requirements better

>>29785572
I mean, that'd be the explanation. But what does it have over a modular build and amphibious abilities?

>>29785572
Less expensive, a bit more mine resistant, more mobile. I don't think the Vodnik's modularity really went anywhere

>>29785840
I'm surprised it is more mine resistant, I understand less expensive and it's speed though.

>>29785461
More of a sweet target for the SRAW and any missile launcher.

>>29786020
It's a pretty decent armoured vehicle in arma.