4 federal agents shot with automatic weapons

>>29721044
>"Fully automatic weapon, for sure, it sounded like," King said.
Lol that's solid proof.

>>29721044
>""Fully automatic weapon, for sure, it sounded like," King said."

Hey, this random faggot said something that aligns with our political bias, let's go ahead and just use his baseless commentary as a completely reasonable truth!

File: 1458972485980.jpg (789KB, 850x1200px) Image search: [Google]

789KB, 850x1200px

I was about to do a spit-take. In light of Hollis v Holder, pretty blatant false flag. But

>Lindsay Haight and Emerson King told the station the gunfire came very rapidly.
>"Fully automatic weapon, for sure, it sounded like," King said.

Calm your tits, this is just nogunz nogunzing. Like that time when someone (might have been CNN again, now I think of it) said that the bullet buttons on the SB shooters' ARs made them easily convertible to full auto or some such drivel.

>>29721065
>>29721077

Also,

>tacked on at very end of article as the last sentence

No way that's trying to create bias

>>29721094
Yes, but the problem is that other no guns see these comments and are retarded enough to take them as fact, and also too retarded to see that it is obviously a false flag. Now we have the majority buying into that drivel...

>>29721044
>Nfa here to stay. Reeeee

Yes cause I'm they were machine guns and I'm sure they were registered and legally owned by nice law abiding people.

Fucking gun grabber git owt.

File: zTsa52p.jpg (115KB, 485x578px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 485x578px

>>29721044
He's back

>>29721128
>false flag
We're you born retarded or did you pick it up somewhere?

not like the FBI doesn't use Full-auto weapons...

Not like the police forces during Boston Bombings didn't shoot up neighborhoods at the sight of their shadows with Full-auto.

>>29721044
Watch the video, clearly semi-automatic.

>>29723351
>>We're
lmfao

>>29725494
your and idiot

>>29721044
Some anon in a Hollis v Lynch thread called a false flag.
I mean it's a pretty sure thing but not surprised.

>>29725505
all those wrong words
lol
dummy

>>29723351
>We're.

You've got to be fucking kidding me.

>>29721044

How convenient

>>29721094
>In light of Hollis v Holder, pretty blatant false flag

>conflating your own bubble of autism with what normies know about
Embarrassing

>>29723351
>We're
You tried.

>>29725505
>You're an idiot.

>Building burned down.

Well, why didn't they bulldozer it to? That's their standard procedure right?

>>29726331
>>29725513
>implying he's not doing it on purpose

>>29721044
>random normies saying it was full auto

Yeah naw

File: 1444014621105.jpg (64KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 499x499px

>>29721044

>Standoff with federal agents

>Fire gets set ablaze


Everyfucking time.

Feds will just set your shit on fire yo.

>>29723351
>We're
I think you need to learn how to spell before claiming others to be retarded.

>>29726346
No fire destroys evidence better.