IFV/APC

>>29712655
In terms of what? Firepower? Protection? Mobility?

>>29712662

Overall desu.

Just a curiosity since there are fuckload of models around the world.

I see the the BTR is pretty good on Firepower and Protection,

>>29712655
Patria
Kurganets is xboxhueg, Bradley is obsolete, Stryker has wheels (lol), Namer perfectly fills in an Israel-sized niche, BMP-3 a shit gun
did I miss anyone important?

File: 4mayrehearsal_21.jpg (1MB, 2250x1455px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2250x1455px

>>29712655
The Boomerang is excellent.

>>29712849
At driving in parades.

>>29712849

BTR is better.

>>29712700
Patria cannot into snow
VCBI has high capacity so more Frenchmen can retreat
Boxers are expensive

File: 4652.jpg (3MB, 2500x1905px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2500x1905px

>>29712700
>BMP-3 a shit gun

Which is shit? The 100mm that has a barrel life of like 6,000 rounds or the 30mm which is a modified bmp 30mm afaik which has a lower rof but it's more accurate I think.

>>29712950
Where is this place?

>>29713052
given that the BMP-3's are CG it is probably just a random picture

>>29712679
>BTR
>Good protection

File: CmugKA.jpg (34KB, 700x334px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 700x334px

What is pic related?

>>29713076
Something that is apparently being redesigned as it has not shown up in the preparation for the Victory Day parade.

>>29713101

I actually meant OP's.

File: 9may2015Moscow-09_(cropped).jpg (2MB, 2250x1463px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2250x1463px

>>29712655

File: 2012-05-10%20Ravlunda%20506web.jpg (237KB, 1066x711px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1066x711px

not sure if its the best, but the 9040 is pretty good overall

>>29712662
In terms of looks, fucboy.

File: AAV-7 Favela.jpg (111KB, 900x599px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 900x599px

>>29713250

AAV desu.

>>29713289
25 barbequed marines per AAV too

File: ORD_AMOS_on_Patria_AMV_lg.jpg (258KB, 1024x694px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 1024x694px

>>29713230
only thing it lacks is flexibility

File: 141107507488.jpg (606KB, 2288x1712px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 2288x1712px

>>29713318
Lacking flexibility you say?

>>29713301

They did well, throughout it's history desu.

File: wiesels.jpg (486KB, 1600x1067px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 1600x1067px

>>29713404
mmm
I might have to reconsider
and speaking of flexibility

File: LAV-III MK6.jpg (47KB, 490x393px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 490x393px

LAV III.

>>29713484
They look like tanks from Advanced Wars.

>>29713484
those ifvs have a nice mustache

>>29713501
i miss those games so much

File: 1365515733961.png (10KB, 408x286px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 408x286px

>>29712896
>Patria cannot into snow
do tell

>>29713521
IIRC it was Fin anons complaining about them in wheels vs tracks threads.

File: guarani5.jpg (282KB, 803x600px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 803x600px

I like OP's.

File: 1460598447290.jpg (271KB, 1280x923px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 1280x923px

>>29712679
>Overall
Different countries have different needs and different limitations.

I think in an ideal world everyone would want something with the armor of a Namer, the strategic mobility of the VAB, the on-road performance of wheels, the off-road performance of very large low-pressure tracks, the amount and variety of ammo of the BMP-3, and the maintenance requirements of a Geo Metro.

Pic only partially related

>>29713587
>the amount and variety of ammo of the BMP-3
>not wanting the power of the BMP-T
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=At1CeObLkqk

>>29713612
BMPT is not relevant to this discussion or thread as it is not an APC/IFV according to the accepted definitions of said acronyms

>>29713612
1. BMPT is not IFV/APC, its a fire support vehicle on tank chassis.
2. 100mm+ATGM+30mm+7people is quite compareable to 2x30mm+4xATGM.

>>29713612
> it is not an APC/IFV
>>29713630
>BMPT memevehicle
Actually I must admit you are still right - it is a similar weapon package to that on the T-15 heavy IFV turret, and it's a potent and diverse weapon set for the kind of jobs an IFV would be expected to fill.

File: m2-bradley.gif (73KB, 1069x1473px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1069x1473px

>>29712700
> Bradley is obsolete

Yes goy... I mean, dude! We need NEW vehicles... that cost a bazillion dollars each and are not substantially better then the existing vehicle!

File: AAV-Nsry.jpg (602KB, 1800x1214px) Image search: [Google]

602KB, 1800x1214px

>>29713471

I guess.