Well /k/ is it gimmicky or sexy ?

>>29576728
Yes?

File: 1440042187063.jpg (98KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 400x400px

SAGE

File: 1458275928208.jpg (99KB, 767x960px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 767x960px

>>29576728

I can't tell, you should find a better pic.

>>29576775

Learn how sage works before you try to use it, dumbass.

File: 1442117671972s.jpg (3KB, 125x90px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 125x90px

>>29576819
So you like it?

>>29576728
Looks dope, I wouldn't buy one though.

>>29576865
i could not find a $ on it
I guess the story is some guy made it for his buddy. It's a one of kind piece.

>>29576728
Gimmicky? There is no gimmick involved, it's literally just a painted Glock, I don't understand what about it could be a gimmick.

I don't like the idea of painting firearms to look like toys. It looks cool, though.

It's cool, but I doubt there is a market for it. Unless you wanted to fire up Duck Hunt and finally shoot that fucking dog.

File: cubone.jpg (7KB, 229x220px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 229x220px

>>29576922
>Gimmicky? There is no gimmick involved,
really bro?!? C'mon man!

>>29576833

I fucking love it, I was just bitching about the picture size.

File: a74bbac08a9d8fc7304128516b313a7d.jpg (13KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 236x236px

>>29576922
>I don't like the idea of painting firearms to look like toys.
Eh it's just a Glock, pretty middle of the road price. If you're into that kind of thing and have the cash to get a paint job like that done I can see the fun in doing it, but that's all it'd be fore: fun. Something to show off to your buddies, a conversation starter at the range, that kind of thing. I definitely wouldn't wanna do it to some nice $1200 gun though (again, unless you've got the cash to burn and you're into that sort of thing)
Personally, I've got a fetish for really outlandish looking race guns like pic related.

>>29577079
I'm not saying that I don't like firearms painted to look like toys because it makes it look cheap.

I don't like it because firearms are not toys, and they shouldn't be made to look like them.

It's their property, though, they can do what they want.

>>29577124

To each their own. Long as it's properly stored/locked up where no kid or dumbass can get ahold of it, I don't see any harm.

>>29576728

Its a fun little custom job replicating am iconic object because of fun.

If it was purple and green with fake blood splatter and biohazard symbols it would be terrible, but this is a fun little show piece that was well done.

I wouldn't ever do it because I don't have that kind of money, I would just buy a normally colored firearm, but its not like its a bad job and it isn't a historically rare firearm so the Nintendo blaster Glock is just fine.

A competition gun in this style would be fun too, because competition guns are already gaudy as hell, might as well have a theme.

File: 1275935576026.jpg (93KB, 381x277px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 381x277px

>>29576728
Altering the outwards appearance of a firearm so that it appears as something other than a firearm, or conceals or alters the serial number on the firearm, is a violation of the law in most states.

And it's childish.

>>29576728
of course its gimmicky, its not like its a production gun

Can it really be gimmicky if it's not meant to be sold? I mean, if it's just for personal use and you like the look of it, can that be considered a gimmick?

File: 1457833310862.jpg (105KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 720x960px

I shot a 45 for the first time yesterday.
How come the recoil is so mild?
It was like shooting a CZ 75 or something, maybe just a little more.
It was a Springfield 1911 A1 btw

What reddot is that?