RIP revolvers

File: image.jpg (29KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 259x194px

Not to mention you can upgrade
>barrel size/length
>recoil compensator
>rechamber to different caliber if wanted
>add light/laser/bipod/foregriplol/etc
at will whenever

It's a very powerful gun. I you can carry it regularly and handle it as well as smaller calibers you will have a bit of an advantage.

File: tmp_25587-batf_5160(2)785538559.jpg (27KB, 300x200px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 300x200px

>>29404400
>Pistol
>Foregrip

>>29404344
Probably weight, overall a 29 is a bigger gun, and some people just prefer a snub to a semi.

I would compare them more to the 26, considering most snubs are in 38, and nine has more similar ballistics

>>29404490
The 26 still beats the hell out of a snub.
10 rounds of 9mm vs 5-6 rounds of .38
No external hammer to get snagged
Trigger isn't 25 pounds
100 times faster reloads
Capacity from 10 rounds to 33 rounds

Literally why do people still carry revolvers?
There's a guy on my fire department that owns a Glock 19 yet EDCs a 5-shot .357

>>29404344
Revolvers are more resistant to infrequent maintenance

>>29404344

Semi autos jam. Revolvers do not. It's that simple.

>>29404579
Yeah if you're a limp-wristed faggot and/or only clean your gun every 10,000 rounds

>>29404562
I'm not disagreeing, bud.

>>29404579
Lies revolvers can jam too

>>29404344
Because I don't like glocks.

>>29404344
They really need to release a compact frame 10mm pistol, Id be all over that like white on rice.

>>29404344

>10mm

>better than 357 magnum

>>29404657
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0h1XlsskYmY

Do you have any proof 10mm is superior to .357 magnum?

File: image.jpg (63KB, 460x352px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 460x352px

>>29404579
I've seen more revolvers blow up than Glocks. Maybe it's just me.

>>29404344
Women need something to carry, that will function despite never being maintained ever.

>>29404344
Exploding in your hand : priceless.

File: image.jpg (51KB, 483x580px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 483x580px

>>29404673
DUH NEWFAG

>>29404668

>kills juvenile moose

>implying this is somehow impressive

are you implying 357 magnum is incapable of taking down big game?

I mean you are one of the worst trips, but this is severe retardation

>>29404344
>10-15 rds
You can use the kriss/magpul extensions to get 32 rounds of 10mm though.

File: image.jpg (106KB, 611x793px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 611x793px

>>29404696

>>29404562
Not necissarily from a size or weight perspective.

>>29404735
.357 sig isnt .357 magnum

>>29404696
>>29404852

What about the firing pin issue? Glock refuses to tell the public what metal their firing pins are made of

>>29404562
Has his snub gotten him killed yet? Does he have full blown shootouts every Thursday?Ever heard of contact shots? Does it normally bother you when people have different preferences?

>>29404647
God yes, every time I mention that somebody tries to tell me the g19 and g29 are the same size. Aside from being lazy there is no goddamn reason they shouldn't have Legitimate 4" barrel with a 12-13rd capacity. The g29 is already a sticky bitch that needs a grip extension and a lot off folks opt for a new barrel so what the hell glock

>>29404674
>I've seen Pictures of
Ftfy

Probably because people like to homebrew magnums under the assumption that revolvers will handle more dickery without toying with fully supported barrels and proper spring rates

>>29404344
Because I like revolvers more as do many other people... hence revolvers will always be around

>>29404674
no fucking way that not an ammo related issue probably some dumb hand loader

>>29404344
Because you don't want to blow your leg off?

File: aW2l4d2.gif (804KB, 1307x734px) Image search: [Google]

804KB, 1307x734px

>>29407346
THAT'S the problem you have with that image?

File: DSCF0553.jpg (631KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

631KB, 1600x1200px

>>29404657
>me
>owning both
>you
>ever shot a gun in your life
>not so much
10mm > .357mag

File: DSCF7998.jpg (798KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

798KB, 2048x1536px

>>29408680
Mines made of Titanium. I'm special like that.

>>29404344
Because this is America mother fucker where I have the Fucking freedom to choose which ever I god damn want.

File: 1449437399968.jpg (20KB, 600x420px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 600x420px

>>29410804

>If our opinions differ I'll just say you own no guns!

10mm is inconsistent, there are loads that are barely hotter than .40, hard cast bullets tumble out of OEM glock barrels, meanwhile 357 is consistent. Also, if you knew jack shit you'd know you have better ballistics out of your revolver because of the barrel length.

I've been hearing rumors about Glock 30/29 having feeding problems with JHP/Flat head FMJ, can someone verify this? I really want a 30s.

>>29410914
There are .357mag loads that are barely hotter than .38spl, faggot. It's not "inconsistent" because of it. Glock says not to use cast lead bullets out of their polygonal barrels anyway, but I'd love proof of what you're referring to, including both the ammo data and specific model and barrel length.

>>29404562
If you're asking, I'll say why I carry a revolver.

I can put it in my front pants pocket and it is invisible, even when I'm gripping it.

I can put it in my jacket pocket, grip it and shoot it without issue.

Despite all the things I hear on /k, I've never had a revolver break or malfunction.

No such thing as limp wristing it, at least in my personal experience. A bad grip won't hamper function.

In short, it's just convenient and easy, and I just don't think I need more than 5 rounds, and I won't be mugged further away than 2 feet, so double action close range work is fine for me.

I love my autoloaders for classes/competition and shtf fantasy, but in everyday life, I think my j-frame is all I really need.

>>29404615

Untrue.

I have had a rash of failures with my Glocks recently. First my trusty 17 just died at an IDPA match 3 months ago. Looks like the striker spring wore out. Worked great the week before, but the match was literally "bang, click, tap, rack, click, tap, rack, bang, click"

So I switched to my 19 the next match, and it is a new and clean gen 4. TWO jams (FTE), and the best theory I have is somethings off with the extractor.

Guns of all types go click when they should go bang...just happens.

>>29404344
Because I like revolvers a little more.

Also
>.45 long colt master race

>>29404579
Revolver internals can get fucked up, and unlike a semi auto jam, you can't fix that in a few seconds

>>29404400
>add forgriplol

Nice try ATF but I don't even have a dog for you to shoot.

>>29411153
I had a 36 that I had to send back because of terrible malfunction rate.

Has run great since it came back. They just swapped out a bunch of common springs and that fixed it, but so much for Glock perfection.

File: SP32-20060918-215257.jpg (76KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 800x600px

>>29413873

http://gundata.org/blog/post/10mm-vs-40-summary-and-ballistics/

10mm is a meme cartridge, you may as well carry 40 cal if you're too retarded to carry 9mm.

If you want serious, next level penetration and performance 10mm is a joke, get up to 454 at least

>38 special the same as 357 magnum

"no"

http://www.diffen.com/difference/.357_Magnum_vs_.38_Special#Performance_and_Accuracy

also pic related

>>29414246
>.45 colt STRONK

>>29404344
Isn´t the Glock 40 better than the 29?

>>29410914
>Also, if you knew jack shit
I own them. You don't. I have person experience. You don't.

>>29410814
Literally why not tungsten?

File: pow.jpg (43KB, 500x338px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x338px

gun nut faggots are so funny....go shoot urself plz

>>29414920
Find me one and I will purchase it.

File: 8db.png (54KB, 919x737px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 919x737px

>>29414934

>>29414246
this is what your source says, faggit:
>We are personally big fans of the 10mm it's an amazing round that packs a punch similar to a revolver rounds but whose capacity fits in a in a semiautomatic pistols. In our opinion it's an amazing cartridge - See more at: http://gundata.org/blog/post/10mm-vs-40-summary-and-ballistics/#sthash.wTTnk9Cg.dpuf

>>29414246
also, you're a fucking idiot.

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>29414246
>If you want serious, next level penetration and performance 10mm is a joke, get up to 454 at least

I also have both of these and you're wrong also. So much wrong in these threads.

>>29414790
In a long slide setup, IE LARGE FRAME! yes it is.

File: 10mm.jpg (269KB, 960x686px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 960x686px

>>29415014

>we like 10mm a lot even though we just proved its hardly any more powerful than .40

+30 fps, +24 energy. thats inconsequential.

>>29414882

ah yes the old nogunz argument. sorry, data doesnt lie no matter how many times you get butthurt and cry nogunz.

>>29415023

eloquent argument there fagtron

>>29415316

so you're only half retarded, congrats

>all this 10mm butthurt

File: DSCF0089.jpg (630KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

630KB, 1600x1200px

>>29415752
You don't have any guns and post on a weapons board. Muh data. You are a little man child.

>>29415752
They make .40 that will do 1670fps?
neat
https://www.underwoodammo.com/10mm-auto-115-grain-xtreme-defender/

>>29415752
Your statistics are from weak loads, faggot.

>>29415941
>>29415939
>>29415857

>10mm IDF using literal memes for defense

>>29415752
>+30 fps, +24 energy. thats inconsequential
That's some FBI light shit, nigga

File: thisamusesthefuhrer.jpg (6KB, 244x238px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 244x238px

>>29415857

>you understand ballistics physics but dont own guns

>this is the logic of the average shitposter

try and compose an argument above the 8th grade level

>>29415939

>115 grains

>>29415941

>your own source said they like 10mm

>but they used weak loads

10mm fags so insecure

File: RightProfile.jpg (244KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1280x960px

>>29415939
>>29415752
You're a fucking retard.

Also nice job suggesting .454 and completely forgetting about .400 Corbon, the legit NEXT STEP UP FROM 10MM.

You don't know ammunition, you don't know terminal ballistics and your lack of any critical thinking skills is severely and blatantly shining brighter than Time Square.

I fucking hate you. Die in a fire, with AIDS - fuck that with GRIDS instead (if you even know what that is), while you're trying to save someone you love.

>>29404400
bipod on a fucking pistol.

>>29416006

>this is how assblasted 10mm fanboys get when you attack their precious stepchild caliber

>muh .400
>muh boutique calibers

454 shits all over .400 and 10mm why the fuck would you use it

>>29414004
are you telling me that on /k/ people look down onto revolvers?

>>29416006
.400 corbon is slower than 10mm

150g
.400 corbon - 1400fps
10mm - 1530fps

>>29416036
.500 SW shits over .454 why the fuck would you use it?

>>29404344
are you telling me that you are willing shotting 10mm on a polimer weapon?

>>29416059
A rifle shits over .500sw, why would you use it?

>>29416006
>400 Cor-bon
>not .40 Super
>didn't even mention 9x25 Dillon

File: 44.jpg (58KB, 640x478px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 640x478px

>>29404344
>>10mm better than .357
Nope. Hot .357 is better
>>10-15rds better than 5-6rds
It's called Bullet placement. Learn to shoot.
>>same reliability with faster and easier reload
Hammer down on an empty chamber w/revolver is safer than any chambered auto. Revolver will never jam, simpler to use under stress
>>dat 10mm tho
Rather have .44, particularly in bear country

File: 1425764330541.jpg (80KB, 637x476px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 637x476px

>>29416068
>Polymer pistols are actually the only pistols that can handle full power 10mm.
>Metal frames literally cant handle a steady diet of it

>>29416071
a cannon shits over a rifle why the fuck would you use it?

File: revolverfagging.png (292KB, 830x974px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 830x974px

>>29416059

because follow up shots can be made considerably easier with 454 compared to 500

>>29416083

pic related

>>29416083
>shot placement
This meme again? Why don't you carry a Contender in .45-70, then?

>>29416109
Magazine capacity

>>29416109
>In b4 nukes

>>29416199
>inb4 weaponized singularities

File: QAKFpPF.gif (967KB, 490x367px) Image search: [Google]

967KB, 490x367px

>why use 10mm? 9mm is plenty for humans, more capacity, quicker follow up shots, tons of different loads

>might as well get into something really stronk for big game, etc

>HURR WELL BY THAT LOGIC MIGHT AS WELL CARRY NUKES AND ARTILLERY I GUESS

t. 10mm owner

File: IMG_20160309_102437022.jpg (2MB, 1945x2029px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1945x2029px

>>29416244
I own a 9mm, 10mm, and .45
They all have the same mag capacity.

>>29416257

>different sized handguns

>somehow not relevant

>>29404344
On a scale of 1 to 10, how much of a faggot are you, OP?

>>29404400
Technically you can't, I don't know of anything that's not a light or laser that comes with a glock adapter

>>29404636
Then you are stupid.

File: image.jpg (51KB, 464x328px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 464x328px

>>29416197
who needs magazines when you can feed cannons with belts?

>>29416244
10 mm can take down a cape buffalo. what do you need something bigger for?

>>29404579
>revolvers don't jam
Who's the dumbass who told you that? When a revolver jams you're better off throwing it at someone. The cylinder locking up needs tools to fix. A semi auto just requires a rack of the slide.
>semi-auto GOAT

>>29410676
>aka ammo related issue
You know the same is true for any handgun out there? Guns blow up from shit ammo, or shit maintenance.

>>29415433
>what is overpressure
I'll take "what happens when you use shit ammo" for $1000, Alex.

>>29404344
Because .38 and .357 are easier to find in emergencies. Revolvers also make you less of a target for looters, since they only want the good stuff...

>>29404400
That's fucking sexy. The proportions just look baller with the adaptor-fitted full-size magazine.

>>29416083
Why don't you post your own gun instead of google images?