Supreme Court Nominee Wants to Ban Handguns, Register Remainder NEW

>>29362955
You are greatly overstating things here bud. He did not express any real opinion on the ruling. His views certainly aren't Freedom-loving, but he's likely not the Turbohitler some are making him out to be- yet.

>>29362955
>a complete ban on handguns is constitutional

>>29362955
>implying the reeeeeepublican congress won't filibuster this to death

File: garland.png (15KB, 756x304px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 756x304px

>b... but garland is a moderate

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/02/18/upshot/potential-for-the-most-liberal-supreme-court-in-decades.html

File: image.jpg (50KB, 800x1160px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 800x1160px

Fuck man. Reading stuff like this makes me wish I was born the oldest of my siblings.
It also makes me want to order the Stealth Arms jig, but I don't have a bank account and I don't know how prepaid cards work

File: 1444176206059.gif (339KB, 370x330px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 370x330px

>>29363334
>implying the supreme court cares about the constitution
>implying democrats don't care about separation of powers or legislating from the bench

It's odd there are so many leftist faggots on this board. Too bad Trump will be the nominee, then Hillary will win and nullify her indictment.

>>29363016
Why do people always compare others they don't like to hitler? There were far worse people than hitler. Hillary Clinton for example. Why don't we compare the people we don't like to Hillary?

>>29363462

Yeah so when Democrats call someone a moderate you should always assume they're a lefty.

>>29363617

I chuckled.

>>29363334
You know, in the era of the American Revolution, any longarm/musket was considered a hand gun...because you carried it in your hands. If you talked about just huns that could mean ship mounted cannons or land artillery pieces.

Hand cannons were small bore cannons that you carried in your hands or carried on your shoulders.
Pistols are a seperate class of weapons according to old english.

So really the california handgun roster and other handgun regulation or bans should not affect pistols.

>>29364017

Stop trying to use logic for antiguns.

>1934
>say a short barreled shotgun is not protected under second amendment because it's of no use to a militia
>2012
>say the AR, AK, etc are not protected under 2A because the amendment only applies to the NG and people dont need scary assault weapons

Precedent as it suits them. I want my goddam cake.

he voted for en banc and that makes him a cockwallclimber in my eyes
I don't care if liberals want to argue "he never actually made a ruling or said anything!" if you're trying to get heller reheard fuck you you polesmoking analspelunker

>>29363545
Not sure how old you are but those are some small hurdles

>>29364187

>a short barreled shotgun is not protected under second amendment because it's of no use to a militia

... and then the masterkey happened.

>>29363617
She was never found guilty of any crimes outside the court of right wing opinion

File: 1211671438076.jpg (56KB, 432x288px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 432x288px

>"W-we don't make funshops hold on to 4473s forever because we need them for a registry, b-baka!"

Anonymous ## Mod 2016-03-24 11:15:45 Post No.29365505
[Report]

Anonymous ## Mod 2016-03-24 11:15:45 Post No.29365505 [Report]

This thread was moved to >>>/pol/68624427