10/22 optic advice

File: IMG_2915.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

I can't remember the term right now, but fullsize rifle scopes are calibrated for a basic longer range. In order to get a completely accurate .22 scope, it has to be designed for rimfire.

As soon as I remember the term I'll let you know.

Pic related, my ruger.

>>28362049
I figured as much..
Long haul i was looking at either a Nikon prostaff rimfire II, or the same P22 you have on yours. I've been trying to determine the real difference between them other than magnification.

>>28361959
go for it. who gives a shit if some retard thinks you're a mall ninja? you can never have enough scope. I just put a 3-9x40 on my marlin 60.

>>28362243
>3-9x40 on a Marlin 60
Are you me?

>>28362049
I think you're talking about parallax, and I'm not sure that matters at anything less than 50 yards for a .22lr

>>28362308
correction: other than 50 yards or less

>>28362308
i had heard for 50 yard accuracy shooting that parallax must be at 50 yards for best results.

Idk if it matters, I just wanted a gun that could shoot one ragged hole at 50 yards with 5 rounds

>>28362374
Looking at trying to turn it into a tackdriver (because CCI .22lr is still a helluva lot cheaper than handloaded match 5.56)

I think maybe the parallax on a fixed parallax optic for regular rifles may be set out far enough that you cant dial down the vertical low enough for a .22. I havent done extensive research on it, but that is the only reason i can think of for not using a regular riflescope on a rimfire

>>28362275
I don't know, anon. Is your marlin one of the old 18 round magazine ones that doesn't lock open?

>>28362275
Kek, I did the exact same thing