armslist deals

I'm surprised he didn't cut off the bayonet lug because of 922r

>>28253331
>that fucking Tapco shit

Tell him you'll pay $500 for it with the original stock and at least 100 rds of ammo

>>28253410
Do this OP.

>$300 gun
>$50 stock
>2x $50 scopes
>$50 misc bullshit
>$25 ammo

>$800 FAGGOTS I KNOW WHAT I HAVE JOKERS NEED NOT APPLY

>>28253410
The original stock is probably long gone.

>>28253331
I thought SKS's weren't made until the late 40's?

>>28253452
Didn't even notice that part. Fucking kek.
>inb4 it's a super rare prototype

>>28253452
Owner is clearly heavily misinformed on the rifle. It should also say the year it was made stamped on the receiver and even if it didn't he should have done some research on when they were made

>1934 SKS
>I KNOW WHAT I HAVE
>DO YOUR RESEARCH ON THE WEAPON
>SKS not invented until 1945

LOL someone send this retard a link to the SKS wikipedia page.

>>28253608
>things that trigger you
>CUSTOM

>>28253331
>can't get a good shot on a deer at 30 fucking feet

I'm a shit shot and I could do that with a pistol. Christ.

>>28253640

What "custom" really means:

A) I spent 10min slapping $100 of shitty parts on this gun, and by doing so have increased the value threefold.

B) I completely fucked this gun up with some harebrained idea I came up with, irrevocably destroying the original parts in the process. By doing so I have increased the value threefold.

C) I believe everything the uninformed idiots at the gun show tell me. They have told me various facts about this gun that increase the value threefold.

D) All of the above

File: 20151216_190636.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

Got this little honey for $150.
Sorry for potato quality.

>>28253702
>A dildo to surpass Bad Dragon

>>28253726
Ribbed for your pleasure.

>>28253702
Uh, what the fuck is that to? I mean I'm pretty sure it's a bolt to something.

>>28253756

Looks like 22LR conversion for AR

>>28253756
.22 conversion kit for an AR

>>28253756
>>28253777
>>28253798
1980s US Air Force 22lr conversion for the M16, with 2 US Army M261 22lr magazine inserts.

>>28253777
>>28253798
>>28253830
Thanks, guys. Is it actually reliable in rechambering rounds? Or is it hit and miss whether it cycles properly.

>>28253955
I have to get a compatible magazine for it, since the M261 inserts don't work with the USAF conversion. It does cycle well with single rounds so far. It is quite a rare find, with the USAF magazines being even more rare. Supposedly one of the best running conversions.

>>28253410
>>28253434
>>28253435
>I know what I have
You can't fool this guy.