What will the front lines of ww3 look like /k/?

File: ss-011.jpg (155KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1024x576px

>>28031697

>>28031697

Couldn't say at this point. I'm more worried about the whole brownshirt police state America has become. The military industrial complex along with the prison industrial complex and how both feed each other are more of a tangible threat than a possible ww3 scenario. Luckily many states are moving to slowly declaw the federalized brownshirts like legalizing marijuana or passing constitutional carry or similar. It's a slow process but the police state doesn't disappear over night.

>ww3
>having defined frontlines
hah, ur a funny guy

>>28031697
>>28031753
WW3 will be the quickest war in existence.

>>28031766
Get out of the basement, take the tinfoil off your head and look at the sunshine.

File: dirt.jpg (42KB, 448x299px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 448x299px

>>28031697
Like this but with more craters and pieces of shrapnel and gibblets scattered all around.

>>28031802
Obama, pls

>>28031766
kek, niggers are a bigger problem than police right now. The presence of police only seems so big because of how much they have to deal with said niggers.

File: FB_20151126_22_52_57_Saved_Picture.jpg (206KB, 719x417px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 719x417px

>>28031697
Bump

File: wtf.jpg (52KB, 550x373px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 550x373px

this

>>28032370
>Poor horse gets hurt
>Faggot rider drops his sword even though he's ok

Depends on what it was that suddenly made nukes not a thing anymore

>>28032447
ABM with 90% hit rate vs ICBM's

When that happens one side might actually feel like they could win a nuclear exchange.

File: SiegeOfAcre12911[1].jpg (142KB, 632x332px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 632x332px

>>28031697

File: 1447627933229.jpg (758KB, 3000x2272px) Image search: [Google]

758KB, 3000x2272px

>>28031697

File: image.jpg (74KB, 612x768px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 612x768px

>>28031801

Give it what anon, 2-4 hours most?

>>28034352
what is those?

Why would any civilized nation in modern times even want to go to war?

It just doesn't seem feasible or beneficial to anyone...

>>28035023
That's what they said in 1914. And 1939. And...

>>28034973
It's a time lapsed photo of the Multiple Impact Reentry Vehicles from a PeaceKeeper ICBM.

File: image.jpg (54KB, 500x250px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x250px

I will be there, bathing in blood with pic related.

>>28032370
>>28034341

no that will be ww4

>>28034849
Probably a few days to a couple of weeks for all the nuke launches to finish and the ground forces to finish wearing themselves out in piecemeal attacks in areas where they can actually get at the enemy.

>>28032310
spotted op 3rd across from the left standng up

>>28035488

Kill count? I'm thinking about 3.2 billion at the highest, 800 million lowest.

>>28035388
I fear you.

>>28035851
3.2 billion is really high for casualties in the immediate term, that's a good number for long term casualty number due to radiation and starvation though.

>>28035919
to elaborate, in the immediate exchange, the casualties are probably gonna be a few hundred million if most of the warheads make it to their targets.

>>28032370
>juss the tip

>>28035951
It also depends on which countries decide to join in

>>28036005
Also true, if you leave China, India and Pakistan out of it, the casualties are gonna be significantly lower.

>>28031899
true fuck the jews and their nation wrecking bullshit 1488

The worst part of WW3 will not be the nukes but will be the ISIS invasion that comes in the weeks after. Europe would be slaughtered because no guns.