Beretta Nano

>>27920273
>I like how streamlined these guys are.
cringed

File: berettananobu9.png (937KB, 816x612px) Image search: [Google]

937KB, 816x612px

>>27920273
That Nano is disgusting, OP. But yes, I used to have one and it is a nice gun.

To be completely honest, if I was going to buy another single stack smaller than my P239, I'd go with the Glock 43. The Nano definitely isn't bad though. I never once had an issue with it in the several thousand rounds I put through it and it was probably the easiest gun to carry and conceal that I have had.

Colt Mustangs are infinitely sexier... and Lehigh Defense makes some extreme .380 ammo.

I don't see the point in a 43. I'd rather just go with a Glock 26 at that point. The nano is thinner and more importantly shorter in height.

The mustang is definitely a contender size wise. I just want a 9mm right now as I already have a 32ACP.

Been eyeing a Nano or Pico for pocket or deep IWB carry as a backup. Lurking.

Also looking seriously at the Mustang and P238 because I like safeties. The P239 is 9mm though OP and I have heard good things. Thumb safeties aren't for everyone though, I understand. Just an option.

>>27921690
p938's are 9mm, the p239 is .380

their both insanely concealable, I carry my p938 with a urban carry holster and i've fallen asleep several times with my gun on me cocked and locked on accident. also I tend to forget im even carrying, its a good holster

>>27921914
What brand and model of holster?

>>27920300
>cringe
It's like 2009 all over again.

File: norwegianpolice.jpg (672KB, 1000x3848px) Image search: [Google]

672KB, 1000x3848px

>>27921914
Sorry I got the models confused. I always get Sig P-series wrong. Glad you at least knew what I meant.

>>27921927
Not him but he did say Urban Carry holster: http://urbancarryholsters.com