am i doing this right?

>>27914233
Back to your sweat shop Dang Phuk

Does it fire?

>>27914233
sure

>>27914233
you wish you could replicate that

File: Doubles-Animated.gif (643KB, 300x203px) Image search: [Google]

643KB, 300x203px

>>27914233
Post results.
Nice dubs. Check em

>>27914415
Could someone not? Would this technically count as an SBS or something?

>>27915440
I'm 99% certain it'd be considered an AOW.

>>27915440
>>27915460
No it would just be a pistol or a destructive device because lol atf

1. Contender or any other break action pistol is not sbr
2. Judge or any 410 revolver without a stock is not an sbs

>>27915523
probably just a pistol. no reason to expect that it would be a destructive device given the judge and others, like you mention.

>>27915537
The judge can't be a DD because its not a 12 gauge so its clear of the over .50 cal rule/sporting exception.

>>27915523
>1. Contender or any other break action pistol is not sbr
They become one if you mate a short barrel to a stocked receiver. They become a AOW if you mate a short barrel to a pistol receiver.

>2. Judge or any 410 revolver without a stock is not an sbs
That's because those are technically .45LC pistols that happen to also chamber and fire .410 shells.
They have rifled barrels so they're just pistols.


A 12ga that short is an AOW.
End of story.

I'm not even American and I know this shit better than you.

>>27915593
Would be if it were smoothbore, but it's rifled and chambered for 45LC.

File: image.jpg (102KB, 640x466px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 640x466px

Meanwhile at Franklin armory....

>>27914233
AWSOME.

>>27916131
What?