Wow, even loli was popular in the middle ages.

>>15775118
Of course
They married actual lolis back then

>>15775123
Except the UK, it was illegal back then. (Then again, what isn't?)

>>15775130
They only brought age of consent laws to England in the 1880s, and even then it was only 12 years old.

>>15775152
Not true.

>The first recorded age-of-consent law dates from 1275 in England; as part of its provisions on rape, the Statute of Westminster 1275 made it a misdemeanor to "ravish" a "maiden within age," whether with or without her consent.

>>15775159
That is interesting, but
What was "misdemeanor"
What is "ravish"
What is "maiden"

File: 1469575948318.png (190KB, 512x383px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 512x383px

>>15775159
This is for Rape! not sex. Until the 1880s it was vogue to put your dick in loli prostitutes because they believed they were free of STDs. There were certainly social taboos about going around and having sex with people's daughters left and right, but it wasn't illegal.

>>15775123
Sounds like heaven. What happened?

>>15775377
They felt the need to infect the world with their Puritan, Victorian, "sex is evil and needs to die" morality.

>>15775377
Marriages between children organized for purposes of strengthening family ties stopped being a thing.

The prevalence of prepubescent marriage (and puberty happened a lot later back then) in historical times is vastly overstated.

>>15775429
>overstated
I don't deny this. It is taken often as a thing that stands out when we look at history, but it likely didn't. There was also some interesting things like the agricultural society "forcing" certain equality for men and women.

But that's kind of the point, it didn't stand out. I'm really tired with the way that we are going calling girls that are ready to conveive, "children", when it wouldn't make sense with any other creature.

File: __remilia_scarlet_touhou_drawn_by_futatsuki_hisame__sample-118b4802c2957e4d14e2f9ba94339f38.jpg (107KB, 850x638px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 850x638px

>>15775306
I want to ravish a cute little destitute Remimi. Then I want to take her home and save her from a life on the streets!

Does the word even exist back then?

>>15776558
It's a name, so most likely.

The only good loli is a 2d loli

>>15775377
Old hags got mad because no one wanted to screw them.

>>15776558
OCR is absolute shit with old text, even though they're printed very clearly when you look at the scans. The digitalization program probably mistook a long s or something for a l, it happens a lot.

File: 1472314449574.jpg (61KB, 480x636px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 480x636px

>you will never be knight married with 12

>>15775235
It means that if you significantly bruise or injure a young woman while fucking her, even if she's sexually mature and agrees to it, that you get some kind of minor or moderate punishment.

>>15775130
One of the English Queen consorts was around 9 years of age.

>>15777691
Nice

>>15777723
depends she was married to Richard II at the time, not the prize catch amongst royalty of the day, nor a long term investment as he was forced to abdicate by Henry IV less than three years later; and dying six months or so after that.

>>15777733
>Ol' King Dick the second had three years of a personal loli

If I lost something like that, I'd want to die six months later, too

>>15775123
>>15775377
>>15777618
People tend to forget the "married" part.
It's not that you're fucking a 12 year old, it's that you're not married to her. AoC is more like a "you failed to find a husband, fine you can go out and be a slut" provision. If you look into laws, you'll find it's possible to be married younger than the AoC in places. Keeping your daughters virgs is serious business.

Lolita isn't the former name given to preteen ladies?

>>15776880
All lolis are good

>>15777821
One thing that really confuses me about society in general is how involved 3rd parties get when it comes to sexual matters. Why the big fuss? I wouldn't care what my daughter or son did as long as they didn't kill anyone and didn't get killed.

>>15778826
>Why the big fuss? I wouldn't care what my daughter or son did as long as they didn't kill anyone and didn't get killed.
Ok? It's not like there aren't people who let their kids fuck without pressing charges. If it's the case that they're both kids, the other kid's parents aren't a 3rd party.

Also enjoy taking care of the kids they make. 12 year olds can get pregnant, but they can't work.

File: 1463298137781.png (184KB, 800x850px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 800x850px

>middle ages
>1600's
are you le serious

>>15778826
The big fuss is that your daughters can't get married because they're whores so you essentially have perma-neets that YOU have to provide for until they die and your family name is tarnished which actually meant something back then

>>15780036
that is between 1000 and 2000, so it is the middle age. Its just called the high middle age since its a higher number.
Cant believe people like you post here!

>>15780616
>that is between 1000 and 2000, so it is the middle age.
Even for /jp/ this is just... wow.

>>15780696
I believe the post you are replying to is what is known as "a joke".

>>15775118
I wonder what that graph would look like if all the times it appears in manga was considered.

>>15777294
soli? sosi? losi?

>>15781166
It could be anything. The spiking years are 1644 and 1677. But you get similar lonely spikes with almost any language, so maybe it is a glitch that has some other explanation.

>>15781195
it's probably because there aren't as many samples from those time periods, so one or two matches would be a higher percent than a match from the 20th century

>>15781205
Maybe a name, possibly butchered by OCR too.

>>15781232
Yeah probably, but I'm just saying the spikes are probably due to the relative lack of content from those time periods.

File: d-51bnuw.jpg (97KB, 513x690px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 513x690px

>>15780616
You are new kind of retard

>>15776272
Remind me of those horrible Marisa doujins by Kurona. I wish I could save her ;_;

>>15777821
I've heard that in the past virginity are taken by the village idiot and when males comes of age they had their first times with the village harlot.

>>15782915
You read a lot of stupid stuff about the middle age.

>>15778826
Sex makes babies, especially back then. Babies are a >12 yr burden that require significant support.

There's also the related concern about raising a baby that isn't yours. This mutated into the female virginity obsession.

Note that current technology has mostly solved both issues, but human psychology, and - by extension - culture, will take a long while to adapt.

>>15789585
>it's okay to have sex with little girls because technology allows it
You idiots would do anything to get underage sex, wouldn't you? Stick to your loli doujinshi, leave real girls alone.

>>15789767
Rude.

>>15789585
Birth control isn't new and it costs more to raise children now than ever, especially with child labor laws.

File: a perfect fit.jpg (292KB, 1337x974px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1337x974px

If little girls weren't meant to be sexualized, they wouldn't be so aesthetically fitting.

>>15790167
That's not Okada Kou, is it?

>>15789767
>it's okay to have sex with little girls because technology allows it
Even beyond the whole "hu u quot" thing, that's literally not what he said at all.

>>15775118
The wording you are using suggests that a great many things were popular during the Middle Ages, including loli. What you presumably meant to say instead was that loli was popular even in the Middle Ages.

File: content.png (11KB, 419x119px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 419x119px

>>15781166
Soli, for example if the word "solitary" is cut off at the end of the line like in this case.
I was just throwing a guess based on experience when I posted that, anyway. It turns out that Loli is just the family name of a bunch of Italian painters from the time, when I searched for the name into Google Books.
Mystery solved.