>be european colony >get independent as a result of european

>>79577605
>nothing
You forgot about slaughtering defenseless natives

being proud of cunt is the most idotic thing ever
no matter what your cunt is

>>79577605
meh, look at Brazil.
They had the same starting conditions as America, yet they ended up as a third world shithole

>>79577605
I don't see the problem with that desu.

>>79577660
>the same conditions
Go study both historys before shiting misinformation.

File: slavery was solved by americans.png (56KB, 2000x2053px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 2000x2053px

>>79577639
that was the brits bruh

>>79577660
>They had the same starting conditions as America
no

>>79577722
>>79577793
Then educate us what is the difference. Both of them started as a tiny colony of Kingdoms of Europe.

File: andrew-jackson-9350991-1-402[1].jpg (166KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1200x1200px

>>79577730
You sound like an injun...or a banker.

>>79577840
Brazil has fuck all resources compared to the US, and didn't have nearly as much room to expand
Its geography is also much worse, there's a reason most cities are on the coast

>>79577660
>the same conditions

Can you even pretend to make some research before talking shit?

A lot of south American cunts have a ton of resources (like Venezuela and their #1 supply of oil) but couldn't do anything with it.

America succeeded because of early Anglos and later Germans, who are genetically superior.

There's a reason Germans rule the EU and the Anglosphere (especially papa UK) have been running the world for hundreds of years.

>>79577840
My English is not sufficient good for make big texts, but I'll try.

First of all, USA was a colony of settlement. Brazil was a colony of exploration.
While Brits was worried about build a country, a new home, portugueses who come here was worried about collect and sell resources, and back rich to Portugal.

USA become independent in 1776, and stay as a republic since it the start. Brazil become independent in 1822, and started like a Empire and was one of most powerful empires on world, with a gigantic navy and a prosperous economy.
So, in 1889, a coup d'etat takes place, motivated by the slavering abolition, that knocks down King D. Pedro II, and from there begins the shit hole that you know today.

Also, I'm writing on smartphone so I'll not speak about geographic, political and others factors. I speak in that text about the more simple things, have much more.

>>79578260
>USA become independent in 1776, and stay as a republic since it the start. Brazil become independent in 1822, and started like a Empire and was one of most powerful empires on world, with a gigantic navy and a prosperous economy.
Sounds to me like Brazil had better conditions than USA

File: beat takeshi gun.jpg (49KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 640x426px

>>79577605
>meanwhile europe is constantly at war
so were we, 224 years out of 241.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/america-has-been-at-war-93-of-the-time-222-out-of-239-years-since-1776/5565946

>after the biggest two wars, europe is so savaged, it leaves you as economically strongest in the world
your continent caused both world wars. maybe you shouldn't be chimps if you want to prosper

it's telling that europe has finally been at peace for almost a century thanks to Pax Americana. you're welcome

File: american pepe.png (41KB, 1240x1256px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 1240x1256px

>>79577639
>defenseless
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comanche%E2%80%93Mexico_Wars

Comanches were actually winning battles against Mexicucks. How embarrassing for a """""European"""" colony, Spain should just give up in shame.

>>79578414
did the natives always have horses or were they introduced?

>>79578896
The Spanish didn't feel like taking their horses back with them, so they just let them run free after they left. Same thing with pigs. Neither are indigenous to the continent but are everywhere in the wild now.

>>79578896
Yes and no. Horses actually existed in North America before Europeans arrived, but they went extinct (not sure if they were ever domesticated... they were probably eaten to death)

When horses were reintroduced, it was through Spain.

>>79577730
>american education

>>79577605
jeez let them alone already

Another butthurt thread about how we're more relevant than everyone else

/int/ at night is fucking trash

>>79578389
Most of these seem like minor strifes in your back yard, and interventions that took place far away from your borders.
When OP is talking about war, I think he means things like sieging and bombing of major population centres, large scale warfare between conventional armies, etc.

>>79579993
>a war is only a war if there are sieges and castles
nice backpedaling, want to erase all of rome's achievements too while you're at it since they didn't use gunpowder?

war is war

>>79580181
My point is that your wars don't really seem that devastating to your country by comparison.

File: repulbican-democrat-jew.jpg (112KB, 780x766px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 780x766px

>>79580432
NOO U FEKEN URO MUSLIM KEK AMERICA NUMBER 1 WAR AR 15 MUH FREEDUMS

America financed wars that destroyed Europe. Besides, America never had devastating wars on its territory. I say the day America turns into 15% white, brown & marxist shithole would be the best for humanity.

>>79580432
It's a feature, not a bug. We have a strong hegemony over our own hemisphere.

>>79580747
>It's a feature, not a bug
I'm not sure what exactly you mean by this.

But my point was simply that wars in Europe have tended to be far more devastating to all participants than the wars you have fought.
It probably has much to do with the sheer distance between you and your enemies.
It would be my uneducated guess that your war in 1812 was the only time your country really took a toll in any war.

>>79581203
Nah, we didn't actually take very many losses in the war of 1812. Our deadliest conflict was the Civil War.

>>79581358
Yes, so devastating wars have been few and far between. And that was kind of OPs point.
All the nations (that still exists) in Europe have had their share of completely devastating conflicts.

America has historicly been a place you could run away to, to escape the never ending wars and conflicts of the old world.

>>79581358
no, that's the War Against Obesity lmao XD

>>79577730
>The British started slavery

File: 1450820151210.jpg (2MB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x2000px

>>79577605
>Their only accomplishment is literally doing nothing and being irrelevant.

Well, if that's how you become a global superpower then the Czech Republic should be emperor of all time and space.

>>79581903
>>79577730
wow, the yank got it so wrong even the frenchie stuck up for us. Y-y-you too

File: Lt._Gen._John_B._Hood.jpg (75KB, 308x402px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 308x402px

>>79580684
>Besides, America never had devastating wars on its territory
We have, but it was against each other.

>>79582183
It was a meme compared to what Europe had gone through.

>>79577605
>doing nothing
Yes
>being irrelivant
No

>>79582183
2% of all Ameticans died in your civil war. In just WWII closer to 15% of all Soviets died.

>>79582096
I usually don't mind americans but they're annoying when talking about Europe
Y-you guys are pretty cool too

>>79582956
>n just WWII closer to 15% of all Soviets died
good?

>>79578039
>This is what German Americans believe

>Germans
>Ruling over anything but their denial and lies

>>79578414
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Fort_Dearborn

Don't speak out of line yankee.

File: Project Capture (2).jpg (1MB, 2400x1800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2400x1800px

>>79587769
Good post