Mathematics 8-grade:
U.S. Asian (non-Hispanic): 585
England Chinese: 564
U.S. White (non-Hispanic): 541
England other-ethnicity: 530
England White-other: 527
England Non-Chinese-Asian: 526
U.S. Multiracial (non-Hispanic): 521
England Total: 518
U.S. Total: 518
England English as an additional Language: 516
England English as a first Language: 513
England Mixed: 511
England White-British: 510
England Black: 501
U.S. Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (non-Hispanic): 495
U.S. Hispanic (any race): 492
U.S. American Indian/Alaskan Native (non-Hispanic): 477
U.S. Black (non-Hispanic): 462
>>79480991
>>79480991
-
Real question is why are Latinos not smart despite having Asian Mongoloid DNA?
>>79483929
>Shanghai-China
The actual Chinese average would be much, much lower.
>>79487256
Lower in terms of Asia. Still higher than most of Latin America.
Also Shanghai would rank 55 largest of 233 in population if it was compared to other countries.
It has a larger population Netherlands, Chile, Kazakhstan, Belgium, Greece, Cuba, Portugal, Sweden, Austria, Switzerland, Serbia, Czech, Israel, and many "countries".
>>79483929
>>79487256
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2015
Yeah. China drops from rank 1st ranked Shanghai. China ranks 5/10/27 in Math/Sci/Reading. Totally BTFO there. USA ranked 40/25/24 btw.
They're better at taking tests, not smarter than the rest of the world.
>>79487837
They are smarter than Mexicans.
>>79483929
arab dna
>>79483929
Latinos are majority Euro
>inb4 WE WUZ WHITE AND SHIEET
I'm talking like 55-60%
>>79490045
>Latinos are majority Euro
>I'm talking like 55-60%
Let's assume Latinos are 55% euro and 45% Asian.
It doesn't explain why Latinos are lower than Euros tho.
>>79487383
>>79487728
Found the chink.
>>79490110
We're made from European low castes (Spaniards and Portuguese) and we're poor.
>>79488351
No doubt about that, but they're no better in practical terms than any 1st world country.
>>79490359
Not what I've heard. Every /lat/ thread is full of
>MUH WHITE CONQUISTADOR ALPHA MALE ANCESTOR!
But that can also make sense too. Conquistadors weren't the smart men. You might say they were the violent and brave. But probably not say they are the smart or high IQ ones.
>>79490415
>they're no better in practical terms than any 1st world country
Which Mexico is not part of?
Look at HDI. Most of East Asia has much higher HDI. Only exception is China. And they are rising rapidly while Mexico has stagnated and even declined since WW2.
>>79490519
Yep. Never claimed otherwise.
All I argued against is this mythical belief that asians are gods among men with superhuman brains. They're not.