Is mixing the old with the new a good thing?

>form of the old
>function of the new

[spoiler]no[/spoiler]

File: 24264269069_fa88ebd861_b.jpg (331KB, 1024x666px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 1024x666px

Do we have a choice?

yes, thats why i only fuck 6 years old

it's a meaningless question since where does the new begin and the old end

>>79348935
This tbqhwyf

if it's done tastefully I think so

actually no, more important that tastefully is SINCERELY. if you try to resurrect a dead thing it will just be a propped-up puppet sort of thing. It's gotta be real.

It's the nature of time
That the old ways must give in
It's the nature of time
That the new ways comes in sin
When the new meets the old
It always end the ancient ways
And as history told
The old ways go out in a blaze

>>79348298
>Stockholm got ruined because of this, Like 30% of Stockholm got demolished to build shitty 70's style building with no character and now they want to build these lopsided semi-high rises that looks like tumors.
Stockholm got ruined because of this, Like 30% of Stockholm got demolished to build shitty 70's style building with no character and now they want to build these lopsided semi-high rises that looks like tumors.

File: 1474578025600.jpg (122KB, 960x768px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 960x768px

>>79348298
Yes.

>>79352673
This isn't 'mixing' the old with the new, though. It's using the new to reinvigorate the old. Imagine a pretty Polish street where every third building was built in a foreboding, modernist style of your choice, that's mixing 'new' with 'old'

File: IMG_20170809_211402_566.jpg (19KB, 320x260px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 320x260px

>>79349293
Only if approached formally. Subjectively, "old" is familiar and that to which the one is accustomed, "new" is unusual and demanding adaptation. The question is indeed kind of pointless, however, because mixing old and new is what happens everywhere every time all the time, because that is how progress works. It's impossible to have new without some old. The OP had to be more specific.

No. The old needs to be thrown out for the new