Do you think China will surpass the US as the first global superpower?

>>79160904
No. Poland has a better chance

>>79160904
Yes. We as the strongest race will make sure of that.

>>79160904
Yes, US hegemony will be an end and become Africa tier shithole.

>>79160904
Yes, can't wait.

File: 15046784515440.jpg (63KB, 604x604px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 604x604px

No, Russia is #1

I hope America will prevail but its democracy been hijacked by the (((wealthy))).

>>79160988
>Philipines

File: CV001.jpg (652KB, 2048x1556px) Image search: [Google]

652KB, 2048x1556px

>>79160904
Decades away at least but they are going fast, kinda scary how they cranked out carrier in 3years while India haven't even operated theirs despite starting earlier.

It's impossible. The only fiel where they can go close to the USA is the economics.

>>79160904
No, I think instead we will have two superpowers at the same time. China will become the Soviet Union 2.0.

>>79160904
The world cant physically support china with the US living standard. Too many people. Also china has lots of minorities and regions with decent sized secession movements going on behind the scenes. Once china attempts to reach a high living standard American companies will find a different shithole to make cheap shit

>>79160904
Yes, it's inevitable.

>>79164567
What about cryptocurrency? China is backing bitcoin if I'm not mistaken.

>>79160904
sorry,no
中国只会像往常一样逃离责任罢了,另外,你应该去中国乡下看看,那里根本就是另外一个世界

File: USApopulation.jpg (118KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 600x600px

>>79160904
Yes, USA demographic is changing fast and its power is on the decline.

>>79164693
What about cryptocurrency? Its extremely niche and volatile. It will never replace the stability of the dollar or the yen. Crypto is just a quick way to pump and dump. The real economic traits of a superpower are high gpd WHILE having a high gdp per capita. This is evidence of a rich average citizen instead of just a bunch of tycoons like it is in China

>>79164835
I hope baby boomers are written into history as disastrous traitors.

I don't really see why anyone would want a miserable one party police state to be the global hegemon. China is really a pretty miserable place to live in and human life is cheap.

>>79166657
On the other hand the US is an oligarchical police state responsible for destabilizing the middle east.

>>79166802
I'm pretty sure the Middle East has been destabilizing itself just fine for 5000 years.

File: Chinese man raping Chinese woman at Ikebukuro Station Tokyo Japan.png (154KB, 600x330px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 600x330px

>>79160904
they will surpass in bad aspect
ultimate weapons of China are people themselves

File: 1499928406362.png (31KB, 755x708px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 755x708px

I hope so. I'm tired of us wasting our shekels on wars and "defense". Let the rest of the world live under the eternal chink's heel while we spend our tax dollars on our own country

>>79160904
When they become majority Christian, probably. That will be a while.

>>79160904


I certainly hope so. And I hope that EU will be smart enough to ally themselves with rising China!

>>79162472
India is kinda the incarnation of incompetence when it come to managing military programs though.

>>79160904
US was a superpower only because all their competitors bombed each other back to the stone age

Now their time has passed

>>79168396
We became a superpower because we had most of a continent to ourselves and two oceans separating us from Europe and Asia's wars.

>>79167258
At least he was raping one of their own.
That's kind of good manners.

File: 1503222173752.jpg (97KB, 688x793px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 688x793px

>>79168444
And because european allies needed material to go to war against germany, which ironically saved the US from great depression

nice trips btw

>>79167432
exactly what the chinese are doing now. and they don't to be a superpower, at least not like the US.

>>79168716
SEA is going to be China's South America in the years to come. Malaysia and the Philippines are already sucking their dick. There's rumors that China offered to deploy MLRS in Malaysia's Southernmost state since they think we're too friendly with the US.

>>79168444
On the other hand, China is pretty boxed in. They can't project power anywhere and are surrounded by unfriendly neighbors some of which have nukes. Their military is at a 1980s technological level and of questionable effectiveness in a real war.

It's been said that the United States will never lose its superpower standing so long as we can afford the best wages for scientists and engineers.

No, but we'll probably see the US retreat from superpower status. Maintaining a global hegemony is mostly an expensive waste of time when you already have an absolute hemispheric hegemony and don't have an extra-hemispheric ideological nemesis (like the Soviet Union) that might threaten your security.

Post-Cold War, we did global hegemony for a bit to maintain access to Middle Eastern oil, but now we have surplus domestic oil production again so literally we're just wasting our time and money patrolling the globe.

>>79162472
>ramps
le nonplussed frog faec

>>79160904
Yes, as we know everyone is dying for a superpower that censors everything and harvests political prisoners' kidneys.

File: gaddafi_outfits.jpg (101KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 750x500px

>>79166829
Killing a couple dictators that were keeping those shitholes together with an ironfist, sure didn't help.

>>79169319
Dictatorships are never a stable form of government, they inevitably fail at some point.

>>79169353
What form of government is stable in the long term?

>>79169353
>implying republics are inherently more stable
People of the middle east have not had a history of democracy nor do they value it. Which is why ME democracies usually fall apart the first chance it gets.

File: 14klg93.jpg (561KB, 1239x943px) Image search: [Google]

561KB, 1239x943px

>>79168885
>There's rumors that China offered to deploy MLRS
You heard wrong, what happened was them offering some MLRS but as expected South China Morning Post made some news that sounds like we gonna buy it to create hype. Only artillery program going around is us considering purchase of surplus A109 A5 from Burgerland.
They did the same thing in an attempt to get us to buy their mid-range SAM previously.
Their only activity around here recently in constructing some sort of flak tower on the reefs with CIWS at the top.

>>79169508
>People of the middle east have not had a history of democracy nor do they value it.
They're not civilized or developed enough of a culture for that and still believe in tribalism.

>>79169498
Some say constitutional monarchy is the most stable although I can point out that the US Constitution is the oldest in the world.

>>79169607
Especially withe the borders the French and Brits drew with countries filled with groups that hate each other. A dictator is pretty much required to keep it stable and prevent religious extremism. Like Saddam before he got btfo by Iran and became a religious nut.

>>79169674
The would be the Constitution of San Marino.

>>79169779
>A dictator is pretty much required to keep it stable and prevent religious extremism
You might buy yourself a few decades at most, but as I said dictatorships are not a sustainable, reliable form of government in the end. There was a former CIA agent who said in the 90s that "We got 25 years out of the Shah. By the standards of CIA ops, that was pretty damn successful."

>>79169779
>Especially withe the borders the French and Brits drew with countries filled with groups that hate each other. A dictator is pretty much required to keep it stable and prevent religious extremism

Really, all that happens is that a dictator arises from one of said ethnic groups and uses his power to oppress every other ethnic group in the country. You can see how this happened in Africa over and over.

>>79169855
North Korea is 69 year old. Plenty of democracies have collapsed within that timeframe.

>>79169855
Republics aren't that great either desu, though generally probably better than dictatorships. You most likely won't go out with a huge bang like a dictator, but they tend to become oligarchies as time goes on.

>>79169922
Of course this is to be expected.

>>79160904
China will win despite being worse in every respect than Americans, because unlike Americans, they do not despise their own country and race

>>79169779
If there's a thing that dictator LOVE to do;it's to raise minorities and groups against each other to comfort his position.

>>79169978
Adding to this, like I said previously, the people need to have a will to maintain their democracies. Outside of the western world and some exceptions, this doesn't seem to happen.

>>79169972
>North Korea is 69 year old

It's starting to show signs of cracking as well, this can explain Kimmy's temper tantrum now, he's trying to draw attention away from growing public discontent.

Only if the kikes want it

>>79170079
American Civil War happened 85 years after independence.

>>79170079
Doesn't NK chimp out every year to get """donations""" of cash and grain from SK?

>>79170185
Generally, yes but it seem to be getting worse now. North Korea watchers say the people, especially the youth, don't respect the regime anymore and consider Kim Jong Un a spoiled brat who did nothing to earn his power. Only brute force and terror are still keeping everyone in line.

File: 1458107576482.jpg (234KB, 640x425px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 640x425px

>>79160904
No. Chinese government system doesn't work for the modern world.
They will have difficult time in 2020s.
Democracy movement like the Tiananmen Square Incident comes again.

File: tmp_27856-happy-cow548609682.jpg (640KB, 1800x2248px) Image search: [Google]

640KB, 1800x2248px

>Amerikkka
>superpower
LMAO

>>79170300
>>79170333
>>79170365
#StayWoke

>>79160904

I don't think the issue will be if there can only be one. Nominally china will be the biggest no doubt. By it remains to be seen if they will be willing to spend the same obscene amounts of money on the military like the us or if they want to be a interventionalist like them. It all depends on what you define as a 'super power'.

GDP per capita USA will be on top for a while until china cuts down their population.

>>79170365
Yeah...no. Libyan anon on /int/ told of how that was all bullshit and Qadaffi just spent all the oil money funding terrorism and building monuments to himself.

>>79170427
Wow this pasta is fucking unreal, is this a person or not?

>>79170300
>>79170333
>>79170365
Are you posting this unironically? Because to me it seems very plausible

>>79170485
>some random dude on 4chan told me this and it must be true
haha yes if I told you Merkel was literally Hitler you would believe too amirite... fucking moron.

>>79170517
Did you reply to the right person?

China overtook the US economy two years ago buddy.

>>79170583
I think a guy who actually lived in Libya is a more believable source than some guy posting Krautchan comics.

>>79170599
Yeah, I've seen this pasta the last week saying the same shit and I've had to correct it the same amount of times that's why I remember it. China didn't have a recession in 2008, that's the problem.

>>79170642
I live in Germany and Merkel is a corrupt murderous cunt... trust I live in Germany I know what I'm talking about

File: mein_reich_europa.jpg (57KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 960x720px

>>79170718
Here is a picture to support your claims, Hans.

>>79163030
If they can get close to the US in the economics, then they can get close in pretty much everything.

Remember that the US domination started with the economics. Thanks to the unmatched industrial output they were able to win both world wars.

>>79170991
They won't so long as they're a planned state economy.

>>79166657
Do I like their domestic policies? No. But I appreciate their approach to the global politics - they promote peace and cooperation(of course for their own benefit but still), they aren't into military interventions like the US. At least for now. They engage in massive infrastructural projects around the globe.

https://asia.nikkei.com/Markets/Commodities/China-sees-new-world-order-with-oil-benchmark-backed-by-gold

* COLLAPSES THE US *

>>79171091
>inb4 muh island disputes

File: 25683648750_6a832c8ab9_h.jpg (2MB, 1600x1576px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1600x1576px

>>79171080
They are not entirely "planned state economy". It's a "socialist market economy".

And if they were to collapse, they would have already. For years already so many Western economists are forecasting the inevitable crash in China, but as for now, the Communist Party has proven itself to be competent in terms of economics.

>>79170642
Why wasn't Gaddaffi put on trial instead of just killing him? Even if he was a dictator, he must have been prosecuted. Even Hussein was judged before he was executed.
It's not like Gaddafi was such a big thret that neede to be killed as soon as possible (or maybe he was, but not to the libyan people)

>>79171178
Bloodless tho. And they are actually contesting territories somehow close to their country, not invading multiple countries on the other side of the world...

I'm not saying China is any perfect, but so far they caused much less suffering abroad than the US.

>>79171296
>>79171091
>>79170991
Please remove the proxy, Wang. You're not fooling anyone.

File: 1502962677512.png (8KB, 251x272px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 251x272px

>>79171373
>ameritard butthurt not every Pole in the world is sucking his dick for free

>>79171373
As yes the classic t. Chang argument

>>79160904
no, not with their uncontrollable debt