Countries not included in this top-10 list are totally NOT GLORIOUS. Deal with it.
Depends on which countries decide to team up
>>78930716
LINK: https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.asp
+ Ranking does not simply rely on the total number of weapons available to any one country but rather focuses on weapon diversity within the number totals to provide a better balance of firepower available (i.e. fielding 100 minesweepers does not equal the strategic and tactical value of fielding 10 aircraft carriers).
+ Nuclear stockpiles are NOT taken into account but recognized / suspected nuclear powers receive a bonus.
+ Geographical factors, logistical flexibility, natural resources and local industry influence the final ranking.
+ Available manpower is a key consideration; nations with large populations tend to rank higher.
+ Land-locked nations are NOT penalized for lack of a navy; naval powers ARE penalized for lack of diversity in available assets.
+ NATO allies receive a slight bonus due to the theoretical sharing of resources.
+ Current political / military leadership is NOT taken into account.
>Not have 20 000 tanks
>""""""Armed Forces""""""
>>78930882
90% of the tanks are cold war era Ivan
>>78930716
Wait, Japan has an army????
WTF
>>78930897
I know. Kidding.
Also most of them can be easily modernised to T-72BM.
>>78930968
They just pretend to not have army.
JSDF are comparably small, but can be easily enlarged due to huge japanese production capabilities, well trained and vast officers corps and good level of techology.
MUH TANKS
MUH CANONS
i thought globalfirepower was just a meme?
MUH SUBMAR... wait, HOLY SHIT!
>>78931174
It is.
Based Panama's trade fleet.