British son: India
French son: Algeria
Italian son: Libya
Spanish son: Mexico
Portuguese son: Brazil
Japanese daughter: Korea, Taiwan
>>78854609
British son: Australia.
I'd argue India was temporarily British son, but India has too much history to be passed as something British (like Indus Valley).
Just because they were under British rule for ~100 years doesn't really make them Britan's son.
Russian Empire was not colonial.
No, Chad is our dear son
>>78855528
>British son: Australia.
Why?
>>78855604
Sure think Igor
>>78855678
thing*
>>78854609
I am France's son.
>>78855658
Didn't the Brits send their criminals down to straya?
>>78855733
DOCTEUR PAVEUL
>>78855604
Don't have money to have colonies you mean. But, yeah, not colonial.
Japanese sex slave: Korea, Taiwan
>>78855740
no, we're french
>>78855740
Not really, no. We got most of the convicts from the colonies in what is now America. The whole prison colony is a historically inaccurate meme, originating as propaganda.
>>78855678
It was a standard land-based empire, not a colonial one.
>>78855800
Gaulish blood in Anglo-Saxon's veins
>>78855812
Did not know that
>>78854609
Australia and New Zealand are our two true sons.
Greek son: everyone
>>78855812
What? The First Fleet arrived ten years after the Revolution, convicts were transported here from Britain because they could no longer transport them to America.
>>78854609
This is what korea in 1930 would've been like if japs had minded their own fucking business.
>>78856119
ELI5: why are koreans so bitter/racist?
>>78856119
No you wouldn't be shit, dumb gook. A Chinese colony at most.
Is that a German colony north of Australia? What's that all about
>>78856440
german new guinea