Is this enough to explain why USA (the most powerful country

>lost against Vietnam

ancient meme

The antiwar movement and media were run by traitorous leftist scum, some of whom were funded by the KGB.

>>78779290
just means your country was too weak to resist the propaganda. a loss is a loss no matter how it happened. move on.

>>78779249
No, US headquarter had no will to win but just to continue war for clearance sale of WW2. Viestnamese are strong though it does not mean US could not win.

>>78779351
>just means your country was too weak to resist the propaganda
It really wasn't though, the antiwar movement never represented more than a tiny percent of the population. Surveys showed that most Americans after the Tet Offensive felt North Vietnam should be invaded, even at the risk of war with the Soviet Union/China.

Most Vietnam conscripts were poor white crackers from the South and Appalachia, certainly not the upper middle class student demonstrators who were in no danger of being drafted themselves.

>>78779464
As Colin Powell put it, "It was unfair to me how many sons of Senators, Hollywood actors, and professional athletes got out of the draft when they were usually fitter and in better health than we were."

>>78779290
Sorry your people didn't want to send their own children to die in bumfuck Vietnam for no reason and under the direction of incompetent and uncaring commanders. Many more Americans and Vietnamese civilians would have died, and the US would still have lost, had it not been for people with the strength enough to oppose the bullshit war narrative.

>>78779249
>lost
Keklel

>>78779249
America never declared war on Vietnam, therefore it wasnt a war. Therefore we didnt lose the Vietnam war because there was no war.

Therefore your argument is invalid

Even the Chinese couldn't win in Vietnam, and they're right next to them. Try prosecuting a war from the other side of the planet.

>>78781069
but the chinese army was and still is complete dogshit