nobody knows exact historical borders between slavic and germanic people, i mean, they managed to convice people that their neighbours that live there for thousand years and who look just like them and share lot of customs/loan words are entirely different spieces
>are germans stupid?
Why is this a question again?
>>78770349
Slightly below Denmark there were Germanic people. The rest were Celts and Slavs. Prussia was entirely Old Prussian, including Hindenburg.
>>78770349
Nationalsocialists, historians and race theorists have considered Germans as the purest Proto-Indo-Europeans/Caucasians (mistakenly called "Aryans") back then.
The Urheimat (original homeplace) of the Proto-Indo-Europeans is not known, but there are archaeological hints which show the paths they have wandered and it prove their first appearing in Ukraine/South-Western Russia. They've spread over Eurasia from there.
Nazi scientists have claimed that Proto-Indo-Europeans are pretty much identical to Germans, so they wanted to restore original Indo-European regions by germanising them. Slavs were considered as cross-breed. Not pure Indo-Europeans.
And have a map of races from an encyclopedia made in 1885.
Light blue is what race theorists have considered as rightful German(ic) clay, as Germans were identical with Indo-Europeans/"Aryans"
>>78771655
>finns
>mongols
>>78771706
Well, this is how it is. Finns don't even speak an Indo-European language. Finns speak an Uralic (Finno-Ugric) language. But they have a more or less big admixture of Indo-Europeans as well.