that indicator only takes into account conventional military tactics, not spy-warfare or nukes which the U.K. is significantly superior in.
>>78695145
Nukes are a non factor, you can literally have a small handful and as long as you have a competent delivery system you're just as much of a threat as a country with 7,000 nukes. You don't need to hit 7,000 targets. Plus nukes pretty much won't ever be used in a war anyway, so again, non factor
The fact that the UK is conventionally weaker than fucking ITALY is embarrassing
the UK is a weak and powerless non-country
>>78695088
Explain how Russia and China can have same score with their one shitty aircraft carrier compared to UK for example?
>>78695361
Weighting is listed at the bottom. China just has a motherfuck ton of standing personnel and Russia has a lot of everything else
>>78695361
it doesn't take into account the technological level of the weaponry
>>78695088
Oh man, we are not even 20 anymore.
It's sucks when you don't have neighbour enemies
>>78695480
Paraguay?
>>78695408
>>78695417
I just looked from wiki and apparently UK doesnt even have any aircraft carriers in service right now. I was sure they had multiple ones still in use.
>>78695088
Fuck off dirty fucking an*lo scum
stfu namefag
http://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.asp
>>78695579
Isnt global firepower site a meme?
>>78695088
>Canada on the list
Eh?
>>78695547
They don't have any ones that could actually launch planes. The old ones were retired before the QE came into service.
>>78695088
>Indian army
What is this meme
>>78695762
Well they have almost 3x your standing personnel
>>78695547
>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-40936071
We launched our new class of carrier just over a week ago though.
>>78695612
They're all pretty much memes when you get down to it.
>>78695801
But we arent in an era where numbers are that great of a perk anymore, Quality>>Quantity nowadays, and god knows how badly equipped they are.
>>78695088
>India
>Japan
>Stronger than France
We can take both of them at the same time
>>78695893
Depends entirely on the geography of the war
If you're at war with someone you share a border with, standing personnel is absolutely something you need to worry about
OP pls stop insulting us
>>78695907
you're underestimating Japan
They're what America would be if we didn't have nukes
>>78695088
why is france sooo fucking weak?
>>78695088
>Egypt
I thought they were fucking shit, how are they above Israel?
>>78695088
>we are below china in submarines
so it's just quantity?
>>78695088
Why asian countries so strong? 6 of top ten are asian countries.
>>78696283
Conscription + large populations
>>78696230
Started being friendly with the U.S. so we started to help them out via: the Mediterranean Dialogue of NATO
>>78696336
I suppose it also helped that they said they'd never ever bug Israel again if they got Sinai back.
>>78696283
The sign of war coming, kinda ominous.
>>78696398
Well that's what I meant by they started playing nice with the U.S.
If they won't attack our allies that's piratically playing nice in diplomatic terms.
>>78695361
Because rankings are typically shit.
All rankings follow a subjective criteria full of subjective weighting which just is another ranking of what factor is the most important (a subjective decision).
Basically, don't believe rankings.
>>78697932
t. weaker than italy
Why is South Korea higher than uk? We have no carriers(only a shitty heli destroyer) and zero nukes not to mention our entire military consists of retarded <89 IQ conscripts with low morale. Not to mention our economy is literally asspain tier so everyone is leave to find jobs. We are maybe comparable to Turkey who can't even fight ISIS durka durkas even with having moden weapons and us support.
>>78697932
Butthurt.
>>78695088
AT LEAST THEY ARE WHITE