>the past tense of run is not "runed"

ran

Right, its ran. English mother fucker do you speak it?

>>78584199
that sounds like something a dirty fucking Canadian would say
YOU
HAVE
TO
GO
BACK

>>78584199
German has simple past tense too. There's absolutely nothing wrong with it

>>78584222
>>78584234
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJ7NVjZ-Eyg

>>78584285
the """"""wrong"""""" about it is that it's an irregular verb. big deal, good bait

>>78584199
Verbs and conjugation in english is so simple and easy, it is very pleasing but kinda boring

File: put.png (43KB, 1888x532px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1888x532px

>>78584344

>>78584416
Really nice

File: 1498777392009.png (17KB, 128x128px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 128x128px

>the plural of ox is not "oxes"

>watch youtube
>most native speakers don't know the past participle of cost and cast are the same as the present one and say 'costed' and 'casted' instead

guess English still isn't easy enough for the average YT joe

File: conjugaison_mettre.png (25KB, 940x1200px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 940x1200px

>>78584416
Meanwhile, for the same verb
I wish french was this simple

>>78584199
Yes! And this is stupid. Do something. Change rules of grammar for example or what.

>>78584573
sometimes websites give as options the correct one, and the common mistake. If a language is not regulated, widespread mistakes become the new rule.

>>78584573
languages evolve. the natives shape the language constantly so actually youre wrong and theyre right.

>>78584571
plural of man is not "mans".

File: subjonctif.png (23KB, 681x375px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 681x375px

>>78584584

Implying all these rules are not meant to weed out the retards who can't speak English for shit.

File: 1502619044855.gif (1MB, 195x229px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 195x229px

>>78584686
>man
>men
>human
>humans

>>78584694
Yes I just noticed it

>>78584584
You're like a baby. How many layers of IE are you on?

>>78584743
'Human' is Latin. 'Man' is English.

>>78584199
Funny thing is that in certain dialects of English English, verbs are free to float between strong and weak forms. So one could find the past tense of 'sell' being 'sold' or 'selled' (pronounced 'selt'), or of 'treat' as 'treated' or, in the North, 'tret'.

I really do feel sorry for foreigners. Complete mind-fuck.

File: 1503335351037.png (42KB, 399x322px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 399x322px

>when an english native says "should of"

>>78584776
C'est une bonne chose qu'ils ne sont plus utilisés (sauf le subjonctif présent)

>>78584743
yes and this is that what i talking about.
No logic in this shit.

>>78584927
The product of learning English naturally by speech, and not from a book. When pronounced, 'should've' and 'should of' sound exactly the same.

>>78584986
see >>78584898

File: poner.jpg (243KB, 1194x602px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 1194x602px

>>78584416
>>78584584
in spanish

>>78584986
>>78584898

File: shig.gif (2MB, 312x234px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 312x234px

>deer and dear sound the same
>peer and pear sound different

File: 1479564600653.jpg (30KB, 520x395px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 520x395px

>woman (woman)
>women (wimin)