why are east asians sooooo smart?

o boy

File: medicalaccept.jpg (31KB, 427x289px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 427x289px

>>78545518
Being too smart have disadvantages for admission into colleges.

>>78545731

>Racial quotas are not real

>>78545518
In Russia it's 99, actually

File: Knoema_Viz_of_the_Day_Worlds_Top_10_Safest_Vehicles_of_2017.png (215KB, 910x476px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 910x476px

>>78545518
East Asians aren't that smart, it's just that whites are becoming way dumber each passing generation

File: CHuluNu.png (55KB, 769x1246px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 769x1246px

>>78545518

>>78545518
it's well documented they cheat on Pisa/IQ tests

>>78545518
Demographics

>>78545943
Do you have any source to back up your opinions? because have never encountered even a preliminary informal proposal about East Asians cheating on PISA

>>78545943
>muh cheating

File: shutterstock_11389939_shanghai.jpg (21KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 500x375px

>>78545943
Whenever an American or European wins an Olympic gold medal, we cheer them as heroes. When a Chinese does, the first reflex seems to be that they must have been doping; or if that’s taking it too far, that it must have been the result of inhumane training.

There seem to be parallels to this in education. Only hours after results from the latest PISA assessment showed Shanghai’s school system leading the field, Time magazine concluded the Chinese must have been cheating. They didn't bother to read the PISA 2012 Technical Background Annex, which shows there was no cheating, whatsoever, involved. Nor did they speak with the experts who had drawn the samples or with the international auditors who had carefully reviewed and validated the sample for Shanghai and those of other countries.

Others were quick to suggest that resident internal migrants might not be covered by Shanghai’s PISA sample, because years ago those migrants wouldn't have had access to Shanghai’s schools. But, like many things in China, that has long changed and, as described by PISA, resident migrants were covered by the PISA samples in exactly the way they are covered in other countries and education systems. Still, it seems to be easier to cling to old stereotypes than keep up with changes on the ground (or to read the PISA report).

True, like other emerging economies, Shanghai is still building its education system and not every 15-year-old makes it yet to high school. As a result of this and other factors, the PISA 2012 sample covers only 79% of the 15-year-olds in Shanghai. But that is far from unique. Even the United States, the country with the longest track record of universal high-school education, covered less than 90% of its 15-year-olds in PISA - and it didn't include Puerto Rico in its PISA sample, a territory that is unlikely to have pulled up U.S. average performance.

>>78546095
International comparisons are never easy and they are never perfect. But anyone who takes a serious look at the facts and figures will concede that the samples used for PISA result in robust and internationally comparable data. They have been carefully designed and validated to be fit for purpose in collaboration with the world’s leading experts, and the tests are administered under strict and internationally comparable conditions. Anyone who really wants to find out can review the underlying data.

Short of arguments about methodology, some people turn to dismissing Shanghai’s strong performance by saying that Shanghai’s students are only good on the kind of tasks that are easy to teach and easy to test, and that those things are losing in relevance because they are also the kind of things that are easy to digitise, automate and outsource. But while the latter is true, the former is not. Consider this: Only 2% of American 15-year-olds and 3% of European ones reach the highest level of math performance in PISA, demonstrating that they can conceptualise, generalise and use math based on their investigations and apply their knowledge in novel contexts. In Shanghai it is over 30%. Educators in Shanghai have simply understood that the world economy will pay an ever-rising premium on excellence and no longer value people for what they know, but for what they can do with what they know.

File: affirmativeactionsupremecourt.jpg (321KB, 653x790px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 653x790px

>>78545770
Its very real.

>>78546134
PISA didn't just test what 15-year-olds know in mathematics, it also asked them what they believe makes them succeed. In many countries, students were quick to blame everyone but themselves: More than three-quarters of the students in France, an average performer on the PISA test, said the course material was simply too hard, two-thirds said the teacher did not get students interested in the material, and half said their teacher did not explain the concepts well or they were just unlucky. The results are very different for Shanghai. Students there believe they will succeed if they try hard and they trust their teachers to help them succeed. That tells us a lot about school education. And guess which of these two countries keeps improving and which is not? The fact that students in some countries consistently believe that achievement is mainly a product of hard work, rather than inherited intelligence, suggests that education and its social context can make a difference in instilling the values that foster success in education.

And even those who claim that the relative standing of countries in PISA mainly reflects social and cultural factors must concede that educational improvement is possible: In mathematics, countries like Brazil, Turkey, Mexico or Tunisia rose from the bottom; Italy, Portugal and the Russian Federation have advanced to the average of the industrialised world or close to it; Germany and Poland rose from average to good, and Shanghai and Singapore have moved from good to great. Indeed, of the 65 participating countries, 45 saw improvement in at least one subject area. These countries didn't change their culture, or the composition of their population, nor did they fire their teachers. They changed their education policies and practices. Learning from these countries should be our focus. We will be cheating ourselves and the children in our schools if we miss that chance.

>>78546157
International comparisons are never easy and they aren’t perfect. But PISA shows what is possible in education, it takes away excuses from those who are complacent, and it helps countries see themselves in the mirror of the educational results and educational opportunities delivered by the world’s leaders in education. The world has become indifferent to tradition and past reputations, unforgiving of frailty and ignorant of custom or practice. Success will go to those individuals, institutions and countries which are swift to adapt, slow to complain and open to change. And the task for governments is to help citizens rise to this challenge. PISA can help to make that happen.

>>78546095
Good factual post
Sadly, facts don't sell.

File: PISA 2012 Response rate.png (35KB, 769x580px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 769x580px

>>78545943
>cheat
Actually a closer look into the data, tell us that East Asians are not the one cheating

File: fig2.png (32KB, 954x561px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 954x561px

o my

I wish there was a country with 130 average IQ. I would belong there so hard.

>>78545518
108-113 for us American Jews? Nice

File: jewcontrol.jpg (61KB, 474x592px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 474x592px

>>78546584
Jews have the highest IQ in America, that is why they control everything in America.

>>78545518
Because outdated map and also most of it is estimated plus chinks and wh*tes cheat

>>78546728
Sure, but they're loosing their power ever so slightly. I'm still just waiting for good 'ol Soros to kick the bucket.

File: simposio-ciencias-e-ingls-en-la-evaluacin-internacional-pisa-2015-results-and-future-developments-18-1024.jpg (64KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1024x576px

>>78545518
>why
Variations in mean PISA scores have not been adequately explained to date, suggesting
the limits of our current understanding of the relationship between educational practices
and students’ performance. In contrast to previous research that applies existing
theories to explain observed variations, this study attempts to extend our existing theoretical
horizon using PISA-derived data. We first introduce findings of PISA-Science
data that run counter to the fundamental assumptions of both student-centered and
teacher-centered learning theories; namely, countries having lower levels of students’ initiative
to design and carry out their own projects had higher scores. We then propose an
alternative theory of learning (Type II learning) to explain this counterexample by rethinking
the learning process at its philosophical and ontological depths. We conclude by
noting a surprising paradox: the Type II learning made visible through PISA data appears
to undermine the core premise of the OECD’s whole approach to PISA itself.

File: 20161210_IRC413_1.png (156KB, 580x996px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 580x996px

>>78546985

>>78546095
>>78546134
>>78546157
>>78546188
brilliant posts

>>78545518
>Rushton Jensen and Lynn
>Funded by the Pioneer fund and are known to do conduct intentionally flawed research

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100121155220.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_Fund

>>78545518
Why does this Jap keep posting this shit every day

>>78545518
I luv Chile :3 and I don't want Chile to get mad :3 But that "89% white" is ridiculous... Argentinian and Uruguayan ones are over represented too.

w8 their are countries with 65. People with down here have higher IQs than them. There is no saving them I am sorry.

>not a single wh*Te country has higher IQ than Italy
How can wh*Tes even compete?

>>78545518
alien genetics

if /int/ is anything to go by asians are dumb as fuck
literally nigger tier

>>78552360
o my

>>78552360
>intentionally flawed
Bollocks. Look up Lynn's discussion with Sam Harris.

>>78545784
relatively it does mean that

>>78545518
Because they study for IQ tests

File: DG_APcaXsAAaa3t.jpg (147KB, 1200x701px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1200x701px

East asian must drop their shitty Confucianism and attain their wisdom from the based laoism.

>>78545518
humans that lived in harsh conditions had to either be smart, or die. East asians evolved in a literal tundra. They are probably the smartest naturally evolved race on earth. Only being beat by the Ashkenazi jew which has had hundreds of years of selective breeding.

>>78566480
did I mention how much I hate jews? Seriously fuck merchants.

>>78566507
btw jews out there, good job with the selective breeding, now you are all inbred fucks LU=OL.

http://jewlicious.com/2006/01/science-reveals-jews-fantastically-inbred/

File: IMG_1199.jpg (174KB, 1293x430px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1293x430px

Wiki search "list of equations"

Literally 1. 1, wasn't made by a white.

That makes it like 99.95% of all science has been done by whites.

>>78545518
why are africans so retarded?

>>78566617
Keep in mind they never invented writing.

Talking, they are basically incapable of speech.

>>78545518
kys zainichi

>>78545731
Why does having a lower GPA increase your chance of getting admitted???

IQ maps should be forbidden and Nips rangebanned

>>78569852
Some colleges try to fill diversity quotas, in the case of Asians, because they score so well, they have to be in the very top percentile to compete with each other. Whereas with a black person, they can get admitted with lower scores because not very many black people pursue higher education of any kind. It's not about having a lower gpa to get in, it's about race.
However, I've never seen this irl and only in images on the internet. I'm white, and have pretty average grades and still got into a competitive program.

>>78569852
>>78570028
Not him but ALOT is literally about race. In the 70s some guy pretty much knew this and faked a couple dozen admission papers (GPA, extra-curricular activities like Football or Hockey, clubs like Math Team, etc etc etc) and found that Blacks and Asians and Native Americans were much more likely to be accepted.He did sent all of the applications to one Good Californian college I forget which one. It's was extremely famous case here which went to the Supreme Court if I believe.

It proved that being anti-racist is literally putting focus on race itself. So basically being anti racist is racist.