why are people so obsessed with haplogroups?

>>78471264

Why are you?

they are not, as long as you dig into subclades

>>78471397
i'm not couldn't care what my haplogroup is

>>78471264
It's not irrelevant. With haplogroups you can trace the migration patterns of your paternal/maternal ancestors. The deeper you go into a subclade, the more recent the timeline becomes. It's simply interesting and provides a sense of unity with other people, which you would have though of as foreign until now.

File: R1b haplogroup.png (404KB, 2133x1245px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 2133x1245px

>>78471583
not really
it's pretty irrelevant

>>78471639

That pic doesn't refute his argument

>>78471687
ok
try to find a genetic connection with Turkmens, Scots and Central Africans
waiting

>>78471719
connection between*

>>78471719

Turkmen and Scots definitely share ancestry.
You'd have to be very clueless to think otherwise.

Africans have a distinct branch called V88 which has been there for thousands of years and is just distantly related to other R1b.