Ancestry & DNA Results

File: dull.png (8KB, 448x190px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 448x190px

>>78097478

>>78097755
What website was this from?

>>78097478
>4% Mexican

when joo buying the lowrider, ese?

>>78097755

>North Slavic

Nigger

File: muhgenes.png (37KB, 876x479px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 876x479px

Rate me, lads.

>>78097478
Da fuck
Whay european Russia considered jewish?

>>78098143
If I was Mexican I think I'd have % in Native American

>>78098345
There's also "European East" that they measure that encompasses the same area. I didn't get any on my test tho

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-08 at 3.39.55 PM.png (45KB, 624x564px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 624x564px

>inb4 54%

>>78098269
What site is this?
Also Med/Atlantic matches with Portugal in general I assume

>>78098469
>1% Jewish
At least I'm not alone

>>78098058
dnaland or gedmatch, one of them anyway

File: 1.png (86KB, 1347x766px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1347x766px

>>78098269
hmm

>>78097478
What's the best service for me to do this kinda thing?

>>78100713
I did mine through Ancestry, others do it through 23andMe.

>>78100767
I like the 100% you got goin on.

>>78101341
How detailed can I expect them to be? How far back is it? I mean, will I just show as "98% scandinavian" or something like that? (my ancestry goes very far back and it's mostly just norway and more norway back to early 1400s)

>>78101341
It's alright i suppose

>>78101499
You can download the raw data from the website and upload it to GEDMatch for more specific results. I'm trying that now and I know other people have posted their results from that before.

I've not done any dna test because I would like them to be a bit more specific than just "european west", but from looking into it it seems like familytreedna is the best out of the commonly used sites

>>78101926
>familytreedna
Why is it better?

>>78097478
>burgers are so insecure about their mongrel family history that they pass around "ancestry" graphics like Olympians passing around clean urine samples.
You're fucking pathetic.

File: chrome_2017-08-08_17-41-54.png (49KB, 1191x932px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1191x932px

Americans aren't whi-

>>78103100
>insecure about their family history
>posting it here for everyone to see
What did he mean by this?

>>78103225
non spic white americans have less african admixture than the average european

>>78100666
>sub-saharan
HAHA NIGGER!

>>78097478
>Caucasus 1%
hello roach

>>78103100
I've seen many australians post these too

>>78103100
Whatever you say chang

File: Australian DNA Results.png (89KB, 870x1070px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 870x1070px

>Average Australian's ancestry results

>>78103428
>Flag
>Only 58% British Isles

File: b.png (395KB, 2280x1132px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 2280x1132px

>>78104496
Ancestry seems to be a bit shit, tbqh. Here's results from a more accurate test that not only does autosomal but Y-DNA and mtDNA.

>>78104560
Never seen a cap from that site before, looks pretty interesting.

File: c.png (502KB, 2530x1270px) Image search: [Google]

502KB, 2530x1270px

>>78104695
It's called Living DNA, it's mainly aimed at people from Britain and it seems to be one of the more accurate and in-depth ancestry tests available. .