US carrier group joins UK’s HMS Queen Elizabeth for "Saxon

>>77919379
BIG

YELLOW

File: f9bdd542ebd33c06c20367635a82878b.jpg (59KB, 489x630px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 489x630px

>>77919379
>role-playing as countries

>training with your allies to be more effective in a real war is a bad thing

You sure showed us, time to get rid of NATO.

File: 1468330789992.jpg (149KB, 1256x1600px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1256x1600px

How would it compare to those ?
And does it have nuclear propulsion ?

File: 1487728107359.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x245px

>>77919456
Nope they're diesel

File: hms queen elizabeth UK-aircraft-carriers-size-comparison3.jpg (205KB, 1100x930px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 1100x930px

>>77919379
That's not HMS Queen Elizabeth

File: 147568935.png (53KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 200x200px

>>77919522
>France and the US are still thz only countries that built nuclear propulsion aircraft carriers themselves

>>77919522
lol wtf

File: HMS QE-sea-trials.jpg (390KB, 1638x2048px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 1638x2048px

>>77919456
These two new QE-class carriers are the largest warships the UK has ever built, and only the Americans have bigger ones. It was decided against going nuclear powered because of the cost, along with reducing the downtime a nuclear reactor would bring with maintenance. Just look at how long France's lone carrier spends in dry dock.

>>77919590
based fellow nuclear nigga

>>77919590
>charles de gaulle is only 40,000t

lmao nice tiny carrier you've got there.

File: 1489215711863.jpg (55KB, 258x360px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 258x360px

>>77919680
>not having a 100,000 ton nuclear powered aircraft carrier, with support ships that pack enough firepower to destroy a medium-sized nation

>>77919715

thanks for your tax money which protects us :^)

Im gonna make another one then, a 90 000t one with nuclear propulsion AND a longer ramp

File: A12 São Paulo.jpg (138KB, 800x560px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 800x560px

>>77919456

RIP São Paulo.

Even though i'd love for us to have one active. It's pretty much useless for us and a huge moneypit. Glad that the Navy put some sense in their heads and use the money for other projects.

>>77919805
Yes, yes.. Retire all your weapons.

File: trump-america-first-678x381.jpg (54KB, 678x381px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 678x381px

>>77919772
I wouldn't lean too heavily on that these days, m80 3.14

Its actually that us and the brit are only ever going to compete for 2nd place since the USA put so much in their military fundings

File: queen elizabeth aircraft carrier7567.jpg (266KB, 2048x935px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 2048x935px

The RN will have 2 (two) brand spanking new 70,000t aircraft carriers with superior ramps, twin towers and its innovative Highly Mechanised Weapon Handling System (HMWHS). While France has one TINY 40,000t carrier which spends so much time in dry dock sorting out its nuclear reactor it might as well just be mothballed. Leave it to use to protect Europe.

File: 1_3964228-1.jpg (18KB, 320x206px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 320x206px

>>77919777
>ramp

>>77919844

Shouldn't you be building that wall first?

>>77919822

>shit carrier that would cost a billion just to change the propulsion because frogs are the biggests jews when it comes to military equipment

Now we have the money for a nuclear submarine ;DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

>>77919805
You'll probably be buying HMS Ocean from us.

>>77919895
That's where all the money we would have used to protect you worthless humps is going

>>77919777
that's the spirit

>>77919914
Are you going to buy them from us too ?

>>77919914
>a nuclear submarine without nukes

Why?

why not just buy old soviet stuff for cheap? they still overwhelm non-navies

>>77919932

Ah yes, the USA will leave a huge blank spot on the map and surrender its influence to keep out some smelly mexicans.

File: qe-class-tower.jpg (167KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1200x900px

>>77919883
I like the towers tbqh.

>>77920004
Because they suck and maintenance is hell

>>77920010
Yeah, its unfortunate mais vrai

File: qe-class-tower45.jpg (143KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1200x900px

>>77920013

>tfw when sold like over 100 submarines to other countries over the past few years
I did not now our military equipments were so popular

>>77920032

The sea, oh the sea, long may it stay between France and me.

>>77919918

>RN is againt the sell
>Some of our navy warships are already reching the end of their lifespans
>A escort for it would take 1/3 of the warships for the Ocean alone, let alone the Bahia which also need a escort.

Not gonna happen.

File: kamikaze-giapponese.jpg (153KB, 626x680px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 626x680px

No matter how big is your boat, you just need one japanese to sunk them

File: type-26-global-combat-ship-dsei-011.jpg (1MB, 3146x2016px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3146x2016px

>>77920079
The UK doesn't sell its nuclear submarine plans as they're protected and are cutting edge design which you don't want any twat knowing about. They're looking to export plans for the new Type 26 Frigate though, especially with Australia where they're competing with the Spanish.

File: stacey dooley fall of the rising sun.jpg (140KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1200x675px

>>77920166
Japan are our allies and friends. Or are you privy to something we don't know?

>>77919953

No, build.

>>77919993

Longer for patrolling.

American so BIG and STRONG

Brit so tiny and petty

File: Screenshot (27).png (69KB, 234x634px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 234x634px

>>77920166
(you)

>>77919379
Cool. I imagine these exercises are pretty easy to run, with the lack of a language barrier.

>>77920236

Queen Elizabeth is almost 100tonnes tho.

File: 2nd battle sirte.png (95KB, 322x648px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 322x648px

>>77920247
Good result but
>sunk
>sunk
>destroyed
>killed
you can do better

File: RN, FN, USN.jpg (134KB, 867x1200px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 867x1200px

>>77920309
The French of course would have to speak English. I can imagine how much it pains them to do so.

>>77919590
At least Brits aren't dumbasses towards nuclear like the Kiwis.

>>77920170

>especially with Australia where they're competing with the Spanish

Type 26 will win since the Aussies had problems with their Spanish frigates a few months ago.

>>77919895
>leave NATO
>sell back all the bases we're leasing
>build wall
It's the perfect plan

>other cunts discussing military shopping
warms my heart 2bh

File: F-35 RAF.jpg (501KB, 2000x1343px) Image search: [Google]

501KB, 2000x1343px

>>77920873
Well we need something to launch the F-35b off of.

>>77920873

Kinda bullshit how Embraer needed clearance to sell Super Tucanos to fucking Nigeria while they're ok with Philipines having it.

>>77920166

They were the ISIS of the air.

File: 1497663781209.jpg (58KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 633x758px

>ramp

>>77922234
>>>/k/

File: 1489606660547.jpg (156KB, 953x838px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 953x838px

>>77919379
About time

File: B-25's on USS Hornet.jpg (343KB, 1800x1431px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 1800x1431px

>>77922578
but ramps limit the size of aircraft you can launch off the deck

>>77919379
we could belt your little tranny country into next week matey

File: 5533501+_b0f76c44e8d4aa2a1b1ee3a4b12997a0.jpg (16KB, 460x276px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 460x276px

>>77919379
>>son need to reteach mum how to navy because she has Alzheimer's

File: 1501766290533.gif (253KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 400x400px

>>77923249
>he says with his nation's puny navy.

Face it, Bongs ruled the seas in the 1700s and 1800s, but are toothless cats now.

At least you know we learned from the best.

>>77923331
literally everything the us does is our doing because you're us