How do Russians feel

Man, I'd LOVE to shoot those down.

Hammer and sickle makes me angry

>>77743268
No one has problem with it because chink copies are inferior. Jesus even their 5th gen fighter J20 uses SU-27 engines while we trying to develop new

>>77743357
trying is the key word

I wish Ruskies and the chinks would go ahead and blow each other up. Get rid of two cunts with one stone.

>>77743371
It almost happened in the 70s.

File: 20090912181821ec7e1.jpg (33KB, 296x430px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 296x430px

>>77743268
I'm okay with it

>>77743371
>trying is the key word
No it's not
There are already active radars for SU50 which are superior to western counterparts

>>77743357
>Smokenezov vs Liaoning engine bay.jpg

>>77743391
in 1970 we would crush china with no survivors

>>77743415
Try again
kuznetsov is now in bay
it would be repaired or scrapped in favor of Storm class carrier

>selling your only aircraft carrier to china

Why

>>77743398
lol, Russia has never made a single poroduct that was superior to western counterparts.

>>77743398
>superior to western counterparts

Maybe in your wet dreams Ivan

Pax Sinica when?

>>77743469
all tanks
all interceptors
all icbms
all aa
all small arms
etc
etc
>>77743486
Yes it's first 6th gen radar in the world

chinks steal and copy everything from every country

this doesnt only go for russian stuff though i dunno why russians here so butthurt over the west and chinks

>>77743512
>better tank than challenger
>better interceptor than F-22
>better icbm than minuteman
>better small arms than AR family

>>77743512
:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

File: trash.jpg (394KB, 778x1018px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 778x1018px

>>77743512
>all tanks
>all interceptors
>all icbms
>all aa
>all small arms

>>77743597
>better tank than challenger
>rifled gun
>better interceptor than F-22
F-22 is multirole and sucks at intercepting
>better icbm than minuteman
Literally all of them are better than minuteman
>better small arms than AR family
AR is shit

>>77743597
>challenger
>AR family
Not him, and dons think we have that much superior weapons, but HOWLING

>>77743644
funny because it's true
fatnik

Russian fighter jets have great aerodynamics but the engines and avionics are crap.

Israel handily defeated Arab armies equipped with Soviet gear, we also made mince meat out of Saddam Hussein's army which also had Soviet gear.

>>77743723
They obviously had old gear, not the modern one.

>>77743723
Ah yes tell me how you singlehandly defeated Vietnam
oh wait you didn't

>>77743655
Everything russian made is low quality. I've operated that shit here, dingus.

>>77743775
Please explain what happened in Afghanistan. Please explain why you needed Lend-Lease to win WWII.

>>77743779
>finnish cutting edge soviet weapon
ah yes BMP-2s

>>77743745
Israelis had poorer equipment.

>>77743791
>Afghanistan
You got him
>WW2
Are you, perhaps, mentally handicapped?

>>77743723
IDK if that's a fair assessment since the Arabs had the export version of T-72 tanks and MiG-19s and they suck at war anyway.

File: 789.png (23KB, 248x728px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 248x728px

>>77743791
>Please explain why you needed Lend-Lease to win WWII.
We didn't
Lend lease was like 5% of total USSR production and started after we pushed germans from Moscow
>Please explain what happened in Afghanistan.
Y-you too

"We received huge quantities of shoes, trucks, radios, and medical supplies from the Americans. Really, victory wouldn't have been possible without them. Yet it is now made to seem as if we ourselves had all these things in abundance."

-- Georgi Zhukov

>>77743398
[doubt]

>>77743804
Or BUKs. Which is only good for shooting down passenger planes and even then you need a professional Russian operators.

I'd say BMP-2 is pretty cutting edge since newer models need a towing tank to move.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMSO14kKjbQ

>>77743853
But they were good quality whereas Russian made were poor quality.

File: 235.jpg (836KB, 678x735px) Image search: [Google]

836KB, 678x735px

>>77743884
>BUK is bad
BUK in georgian war managed to destroy TU-22

>>77743853
Pretty interesting, actually. What do you get taught about WW2?

>>77743933
That's because it had Ukrainian radars and EW systems.

>>77743913
>Smth made on perfectly working factories has better quality than smth mad on half destroyed factories
yeah no shit

>>77743913
Nah, most of the trucks were notoriously ill-prepared for the Russian climate
Why did he even bring up WW2 when this thread is about modern tech

>>77743967
>Ukrainian radars and EW systems.
ok i'm not giving (you)'s anymore since you're obviously retarded

>>77743791
They also couldn't really beat Chechyna, the war was "resolved" by paying off Kadarov to execute Wahabi propagandists.

>>77744011
>Nah, most of the trucks were notoriously ill-prepared for the Russian climate
Russian trucks are ill-prepared for use.

>>77744026
Lol, that's how it was.

>>77743667
what's wrong with the AR family

India is buying more US/French equipment now and less Russian weaponry (their traditional arms supplier).

>>77744259
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/russia-still-indias-largest-defence-partner/articleshow/57290157.cms

>>77743447
Isn't the only work done on the Shtorm a fucking scale model? With navalized Su-50s on it? I say that we won't see the thing become real for at least 10 more years.

>>77744400
I didn't say they weren't still buying Russian equipment, but it's no longer the dominant thing.

>>77744442
Currently preparing shipyard
largest ship that came out of Petersburg shipyard was icebreaker with 70k displacement
Shtorm is going to be roughly 95k

>>77744531
>68%
>no longer dominant

>>77744600
How much of that includes spare parts and support for existing equipment

>>77743597
Nothing beats a Mig31 at interception up until this day. The Mig31 us a technical miracle

>>77746420

>>77743672

>>77746420
The MiG-31 was way ahead of its time, but since then most fighters have incorporated features like AESA and datalinks
The only edge it has over other fighters nowadays is speed (maybe, since the F-22's top speed is classified)

>>77744259
>>77744400
>The MiG-29K, the backbone of Indian carrier aviation, is “riddled with problems” due to defects in the airframes, engines and fly-by-wire systems.
>Consequently, the serviceability or operational availability of MiG-29Ks is pathetic – ranging from just 15.93 per cent to 37.63 per cent.
>ordering russian equipment

>>77743339
Why are Americans so belligerent and bloodthirsty?