>His country doesn't spend 2% of his GDP on defence
Pathetic
didnt know lithuania had military
>>77630177
t. psycho guy
>his country has 2.8M population
We don't border Russia, we don't need to
>>77629477
>thinking 2% og Lithuanian GDP will help against Russia
>>77630226
>>77630237
>>77630271
Not an argument
>>77629477
>His country doesn't spend 6% of his GDP on defence
Pathetc
Don't worry everyone, the Lithuanian military is here to stop the Russians for exactly 4 hours
>>77629477
Russia is only a paranoid regional power, nothing to fear.
>>77630710
Damn right.
>>77629477
Who exactly is Lithuania defending themselves from?
>>77629477
Well, do you?
Last I checked the only country in the EU that fulfilled its NATO obligations was Poland
>>77630832
You don't need to have an enemy to be able to change stances to wartime at a moment's notice.
What if there's a natural disaster? Who will you deploy to keep order and save people?
How will you maintain your legitimacy as a government without an army? The government is supposed to have a monopoly on violence. If they can't protect their citizens from all threats, foreign (this usually means maritime) and domestic, then are they really a country? Who is to say that they are not an autonomous region ready for the taking?
Russia stronk xdXdXdxDxDxDxdddddXD
>>77630848
>obligations
They are guidelines, not obligations.
>>77630988
quality>quantity
5.5% here
don't tread on me
>>77631452
Russian army isn't quality either lol.
>Gross Domestic Product of Lithuania
it was ok
>>77629477
>his country is smaller than my capital
TEENY TINY COUNTRIES,ARE THOSE COUNTRIES FOR ANTS ?
>>77629477
>his country has more suicide rate than mine
>>77631493
9.5 %
Step up
>>77631542
stay mad
>>77631542
Abrams is starting to show it's age. It was one of the first modern generation tanks designed. There are better platforms out there now.
>>77629477
>His country doesn't spend 40% of his greatest ally GDP on ""defence""
You're like a little baby
>>77632195
Wouldn't Syria have >100%?
>>77629477
>Spending more than 1% on defence
For what purpose?
>>77632263
Russian Army looks so aesthetic desu. Ours look like tacticool shit. Stupid fucking ballistic glasses make them look like they're in a science lab or something. Don't like all the rails and optics covering our guns either, older stuff just looks better.
>>77632323
>They're just openly admitting and bragging about it now.
No need to rub it in
>>77632263
You stay mad, pal'
>>77629477
1.9 here :c
0,92-1,7 here. although our GDP is as much as an average western european or murrican village has...
>>77629477
why you spend 2%?
your country and your army is a irrelevant shit. if you were attacked otan had to defend you.
better you are without army that with a irrelevant and useless one