>UK to introduce porn ID checks by April 2018
>THE UK government will introduce compulsory identification checks by April next year to ensure those viewing pornography online are over age 18.
>It will mean ID checks for viewers and includes provisions for fines of more than $400,000 or five per cent of their turnover for providers. The act will also punish bots used to snap up and resell concert tickets and raise the penalty for online piracy from two to ten years.
>http://www.news.com.au/technology/online/censorship/uk-to-introduce-porn-id-checks-by-april-2018/news-story/cd6dc46dca797283c804f76967d54027
Sharia law is just around the corner, boyos.
At least we have identification checks
I support it because porn is bad.
>>77285802
Won't they have to filter 4chan?
>>77285836
This, couldn't give a shit about porn
>>77285802
good
>>77285848
It is only for commercial sites if anyone bothered to read about it. 4chan would not count because nobody is selling any porn on here.
>>77285802
>www.news.com
shan't be reading a syllable of this fake news
why are Brits so obsessed with banning porn?
>>77286004
Because we know it is bad for society.
>>77286012
when are you gonna make women start wearing hijabs, Harry?
>>77286065
Once I achieve unlimited power.
>>77285802
completely pathetic
>>77285896
I do. Buy some porn.
>>77285802
>The act will also punish bots used to snap up and resell concert tickets and raise the penalty for online piracy from two to ten years.
so this is how they managed to get it through.
>>77285802
>The act will also punish bots used to snap up and resell concert tickets
This part I agree with entirely. Shame they always bundle the good ideas with garbage to force the trash through.
>>77286187
phwoarr
England
YES