Serious question

File: 800px-Pois_pakkoruotsi.svg.png (103KB, 800x798px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 800x798px

Why is the Swedish language so bizarre when it comes to nouns classes/genders? From what I have noticed, there is literally no way to tell the gender of a noun neither from Its spelling, nor meaning. There seems to be no identifiable pattern to tell whether you should use en or use ett and the only way is to memorise when to use what for which word. A learner may assume that words for people and animals must be common (utrum) and that for inanimate objects must be neuter (neutrum). Of course the second case is absolutely untrue, but for the first case, it seems so convenient for all living things to be utrum. But then "the man" is "mannen" while "the child" is "barnet". I suppose I could think of this such that since the origin of the utrum gender is by merging masculine and feminine while neutrum remained for neutral words, since a child can be both male and female it has remained as neutrum while man was originally masculine, it became utrum. But then this doesn't work for words for animals that can be both male or female. What animal names are utrum and what are neutrum is also hard to determine. "The cat" is "katten" while "the bee" is "biet". Is this because insects are thought of as less animate than vertebrates like cats, dogs, birds etc? Also false. "The fly" is "flugan". For names of inanimate objects and abstract nouns, there seems literally no identifiable way whatsoever to guess the gender, not even from spelling. In most other languages like French, Hindi etc you can tell the gender usually from the spelling itself. Is there any other language with no way to determine noun gender like Swedish? I suppose Norwegian and Danish are like this too? What about Icelandic?