Impeachment

>>77090543
>Have your country ever impeached the president/prime minister?

Yes, twice. Failed both times, because in both cases the man being impeached was just the target of a political witch hunt.

>the US is about the impeach trump
No we aren't.

>>77090543

stop this bullshit, TRUMP will not be impeached, we need more memes!!!

only Ito Hirobumi

>>77090583
>Yes, twice. Failed both times, because in both cases the man being impeached was just the target of a political witch hunt.
how so?

>No we aren't.
emails got leaked by trump's son himself.

very ebin thread

File: o-THE-570.jpg (42KB, 570x379px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 570x379px

>>77090543
Yes lately.

>>77090663
ayyy

she was the one with the shaman thing right?
kek

>>77090634
>how so?

The first case, Andrew Johnson, 1868. He was a Democrat in the immediate aftermath of the Civil War. The losing side was mostly Democrat, so he was very unpopular by political affiliation alone. Congress was almost all Republican, and they were angry at Johnson because he didn't want to brutally punish the South for rebelling. He preferred to re-integrate them as states. So they made up the bullshit "Tenure of Office Act" and impeached them on those grounds. They failed to get the final vote for impeachment.

Second time, Bill Clinton, 1998. Again, Democrat President, Republican Congress. The issue was that an intern sucked Clinton's dick and Clinton lied about it. Again, it failed.

>emails got leaked by trump's son himself.

Unless those emails contain evidence of a high crime or misdemeanor committed by Trump himself, it's irrelevant. This is why we never impeached Reagan for Iran-Contra.

>>77090625
Wait, I thought Hirobumi got assassinated

>>77090900
*and impeached him on those grounds

>Republican owned Congress
>impeachment
Yeah ok.

>>77090900
we'll see

>>77091044
trump colluded with russia

File: kekke vraagjesman.png (196KB, 400x399px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 400x399px

What's with democrats grasping at straws to keep their wishful thinking bubble intact? Is the reality that Trump actually hasn't done anything wrong that mind-shattering to them?

>>77091240
READ THE LEAKED EMAILS

>>77091072
>implying they care
LMAO, they don't give a shit!

>>77091271
Hillary's? Nah I don't want to find my own suicide note.

>>77091327
No, Trump's Jr emails. He leaked them himself and there is undeniable proof of collusion.

>>77091372
Is that what the #resistance is preaching? Sorry to burst your bubble but that feverdream will never come true.

File: Capture.png (438KB, 1197x664px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 1197x664px

>>77091453
there's no denying.

>>77091515
I'm not seeing an email.

>>77091632
https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/with_replies

here
scroll down a little bit

the guy has posted his emails on twitter

>>77092156
All I'm seeing is a bunch of hysterical cunts screeching IMPEAAAAACCHHH and something about a Russian lawyer who didn't deliver. Crystal clear Russian collusion mate. :')

File: Capture.png (96KB, 1333x99px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1333x99px

>>77093035
straight out of donald trump jr email that he tweeted himself

>>77093160
So... basically it's about revealing Clinton's dirty collusion deeds and Trump and son are in the wrong for bringing it outside? What the flying fuck?

>>77093285
This is against the law in the United States.

>>77093285
Are all trumptards this retarded?

>>77093428
I don't know, ask the line of guys running a train on your mom.

>>77090583
Nixon would be impeached if he didn't resign.

You are right that he dindu nothing though.

As far as I remember, I don't think we have ever impeached a president. If a president here fucks up real badly we just have elections.

>>77090543
To be fair, there is no proof of Trumps involvement yet.

>>77090583
Well technically Nixon was never impeached I guess.

>>77093428
Story will be forgotten in 2 weeks.

File: g92i3swexz8z.jpg (183KB, 1440x782px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 1440x782px

>>77093494
What a fucking disgrace. You should feel ashame for this post.

>>77093670
>To be fair, there is no proof of Trumps involvement yet.
Check this out: >>77093160

His son tweeted his own emails. Crazy stuff.
This jorno got sad that he was working on the story and Trump Jr just tweeted the thing
kek

>>77093770
Hey not my fault your madre is a putrid slut. Maybe she wouldn't have turned to prostitution if her son wasn't an unhinged, delusional rabblerouser.

>>77093919
Are you greek by any chance?

>>77093770
I know the story, but it only proofs that his son was willing to collude with a foreign government to dig up dirt on Clinton, which arguably is a criminal offense.
There is no proof of president Trumps involvement yet, although I guess its highly likely.

The real question is, is it enough for the republicans to turn on their own president?
And I think the answer to that question is Not even close.

>>77094075
>The real question is, is it enough for the republicans to turn on their own president?

I don't think most republicans are very fond to Trump desu
He can't even get them to agree on a budget.

>>77094126
>I don't think most republicans are very fond to Trump desu

But they're very fond of their seats and clearly people are still willing to vote for them.
Whereas an impeachment of Trump would pretty likely lead to a disaster in the 2018 midterms.

>>77091240
They're trying to prop up this stupid conspiracy theory to hide the fact that they lost 4 out of 6 special elections, they lost their majority in the Senate and are a minority party in the House, they have no actual platform other than "FUCK TRUMP REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE", no real leadership except for Chuck "the Cuck" Schumer and Nancy Pelosi (who still thinks Bush is President). It's so bad that the Republicans are literally debating themselves in Congress and even though they are less ideologically united, their party isn't hemorrhaging support the same way the Dems literally lost most of their support in the Rustbelt by insulting the Blue-collar Democrats and not bringing up their concerns at all and still use failed campaign tactics from the last election.
>>77094126
True, but impeaching Trump with no actual legally-admissible evidence would be political suicide on the Republican side because Trump has an actual following in the GOP. If there were actual evidence that were legally admissible that condemned Trump, yeah he'd lose all support and be impeached. But, until then (really at this point, if that's true which is unlikely), they won't turn on him.

>>77094261
He will be impeached after the midterms, once the democrats regain control of the country.

>>77094344
>>77094487
According to the bookies the chance that he won't finish his first term is about 35-40%.

>>77094556
>>77094487
These same people said Hillary Clinton had a 90%+ chance of winning the election. Anyone with common sense knew he would win, because he was the strongest candidate in the RNC primaries meanwhile Clinton struggled against an old socialist, not to mention her fuckups like calling half of the Rustbelt "deplorable" and the Wikileaks shit.

>>77094487
Stop projecting, Whenderson. Wishing other countries to be like ours will not make us better

>>77090900
>"Congress was almost all Republican, and they were angry at Johnson because he didn't want to brutally punish the South for rebelling. He preferred to re-integrate them as states."
>Reconstruction was all about punishing the glorious confederacy, mkay? They was taking 'way our gawd´given rights to own muh niggers!

>>77090663
Well, at least you nominally select your leaders now, instead of having America just back the strongest warlord for the sake of "stability".

>>77094713
>>Reconstruction was all about punishing the glorious confederacy, mkay? They was taking 'way our gawd´given rights to own muh niggers!

That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying that the conflict between Johnson and Congress was over how to handle the defeated rebelling states. Johnson preferred "Soft Reconstruction", with a focus on reconciliation and speedy reintegration. Congress preferred "Harsh Reconstruction", with a full military occupation of all the southern states, as well as the re-drawing of state boundaries into military districts.

>>77094701
I'm not wishing anything. I actually used to like Trump.

File: images.jpg (23KB, 328x211px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 328x211px

>>77090543
yes, twice

>>77093670
oh, resigns don't count?
then my country only had one impeachment