so /int/, who are the true descendants of the scythians?
>>76900766
Ossetians maybe
me
>>76900766
WE
Crimea desu
>>76900938
tatars are turkic, wrong.
>>76901024
They do not look like original Turkics tho
no one. Maybe ossetians.
their genetical descendants could be modern turkics, turkics have lots of iranic dna.
>>76900766
I'm guessing huns and assorted tribes of the Southwestern steppe. also WE.
They may be descendants of autochthonous people that adopted a Turkic language
>>76901171
not really. i've seen a lot of crimean tatars looking mongoloid (tatars live here).
crimean tatars probably a mix of azov greeks, kipchak mongol-tatars and slavs.
As far as I know, Ossetian:
aez wynyn - I see
dy wynys - you(sg.) see
wyj wyny - he/she sees
max wynaem - we see
symax wynut - you(pl.) see
wydon wynync - they see
aez nae wynyn - I don't know
dy nae wynys - you don't know
...
arm - arm
mad - mother
arv - sky
kad - respect
zaerdae - heart
...
>>76901250
A sensitive subject desu
Slavs, and Central Asians.
Scythians were not a monolithic group, but a confederation of diverse tribes living from Ukraine to western China. They mixed with the local subhumans to create modern day Turks and other steppe-monkeys. Slavs however are the most direct descendants and we will inherit the world after western Europe turns brown.
>>76902424
>Slavs however are the most direct descendants and we will inherit the world after western Europe turns brown.
>>76900766
Ossetians of course.