>start 2 world wars >lose them

File: how_hitler_could_have_won_the_war_extra.png (1MB, 993x1443px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 993x1443px

>>76760200

Serbs arguably caused the first one desu

>>76760407
it was the germans

>>76760389
honestly not declaring war on the U.S. could've worked

There was never any guarantee we'd declare on them.

>>76761500
Not really, the Germans were tied into commitments because of Austria aligning against the Russians. And Austria had no real animus against Russia other than trying to keep a lid on the balkans from exploding

>>76761601
lad WW1 would've stayed a regional conflict between Austria-Hungary and Serbia if it wasn't for the Germans chimping out

>>76760389
>implying he loses because he attacked Britain

Serbia and Austro-Hungary started the first war, not Germany

>>76761601
germans started the world wars

>>76761649
germs did

>>76760389
Extremely accurate post if you cut the image off after educated-tier and replace "Supply the Japanese" with "Fix chaotic NSDAP government systems"

>>76761624
Berlin was manipulative, belligerent and tin-eared, but they were a reactive power by force of circumstance. Without the Serb issue I can't see where the flashpoint to start the chain of commitments leading to war comes from.