[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Hey France

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 63
Thread images: 21

File: EFTvDR.jpg (809KB, 1552x1896px) Image search: [Google]
EFTvDR.jpg
809KB, 1552x1896px
Rafales are memeplanes, even Eurofighters perform better.
>>
>an interceptor plane perform better than a bomber
>>
>>76695908
Arent Rafales multirole?
>>
Plane autists should funland get f-35, gripen, eurofighter or rafale?
>>
File: eurofighter-raf.jpg (191KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]
eurofighter-raf.jpg
191KB, 1600x900px
>>76695842
both nice looking planes.
>>
>>76696423
SU! you could walk across and hop on one ffs
>>
>>76696423

Gripen.
>>
>>76696295
they look mostly like a "stealthy" bomber
>>
LIES
>>
I think the Rafale is a pretty plane uwu
>>
>>76696482

So only looks like it.
>>
What's wrong with Eurofighters? I know nothing about planes, it looks cool though.
>>
>>76696423
Eurofighters.
>>
File: su35-hd-wallpaper-bak8.jpg (234KB, 830x553px) Image search: [Google]
su35-hd-wallpaper-bak8.jpg
234KB, 830x553px
>>76695842
>>76695908
>>76696295
>>76696423
>>76696453
>>76696465
>>76696474
>>76696482
>>76696488
>>76696497
>>76696529
>>76696532
>his cunt-ry is not into "battle prupen" sukhoi exclusive club
>>
>>76696423
Rafale
>>
>>76696610

>slavshit
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (163KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
163KB, 1600x900px
*turboprops behind you*

nada pessoal menino
>>
>>76696423
>buying thé F-35
Only if you hate yourself
>>
>>76696631
better than merrifat and eurogay shits
>>
File: BAE Systems Hawk T1A-Red Arrows.jpg (2MB, 3600x2400px) Image search: [Google]
BAE Systems Hawk T1A-Red Arrows.jpg
2MB, 3600x2400px
>>76696423
Buy more of our Hawks pls.
>>
new f-35 builds and f-22 > absolutetly everything
>>
>>76696771
Yeah, they are the best at choking pilots.
>>
File: chosun.jpg (47KB, 739x434px) Image search: [Google]
chosun.jpg
47KB, 739x434px
>>76696423
join KFX/IFX co-operation and joint-production, build a fighter plane by your own country :)
>>
>>76696771

>F-35

So good that several USAF bases grounded them because it kills their pilots
>>
>>76696669

Pls buy polan, it can carry air-to-air missiles.
>>
File: RAF and USAF.jpg (442KB, 2016x1134px) Image search: [Google]
RAF and USAF.jpg
442KB, 2016x1134px
>>76696691
Sexy looking plane and people need to stop bullying it. Each costs not much more than some 4th generation planes now, albeit it has taken billions of dollars to get to this point yes.
>>
>>76696837
aand that shit was fixed by LM installing a new oxygen valve

fcking russians go and continue sucking indias dick for the PAK FA money
>>
>>76696940
Nah It's pretty pants lad
>>
>>76696837
At least with these planes which have had international participation, these things come out in the press and people are made aware of them. Fuck knows what kind of shit is kept under wraps in Russia, no doubt lots of iffy shit.
>>
>>76697042
From what I've read it's coming along nicely.
>>
>>76696995

India dropped that no?
>>
>>76696771
>>76696940
F-22 is good.
>>
>>76697086
chicks build license copies of our planes
theyre /int/ernational too, basically you can buy a chinese SU
>>
>>76697222
they're only going ahead with it if Russia makes a full technology transfer

of course they're being skeptical

http://www.defensenews.com/articles/indias-sukhoi-fleet-faces-problems-despite-russian-spare-parts-deal
>>
>>76697377
Yeah those Chinks are well known to release information to everyone.
>>
>>76697436
why not?
they're also not full clones, almost everything inside is chinese, so if you don't like something you can replace it
>>
>>76697423

Well also heard that Russians were charging a fuckload of money.
>>
>>76697487
I'm talking about if things have gone wrong with Russian planes during the development phase, we certainly won't hear about it and they keep it hush hush. Whereas with the F-35 it's a joint effort between nations, and these things are either released officially or leak out somehow.
>>
File: 740c33bb0a2ede647c34ad8c9d810812.jpg (236KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
740c33bb0a2ede647c34ad8c9d810812.jpg
236KB, 1024x768px
>>76696423
The most cost effective one ofc. It's just a weapons platform anyway. Arm it with Meteor missiles and the Russian planes with be scrap long before they can lock on.

And then you buy the state of the art Swordfish system as well and gain the information advantage.
>>
File: IMG_5050.jpg (239KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_5050.jpg
239KB, 1280x960px
>>76697881

:3
>>
>>76697840
its an old plane and its development phase mostly was over in the 80s so for this plane its not even important, its pretty stable and well tested and mature now
its a legacy plane like spitfire
im pretty sure russians don't really know how to build it from scratch themselves (its normal for legacy system btw)
>>
File: yak-130-air-force-russia.jpg (174KB, 2350x1200px) Image search: [Google]
yak-130-air-force-russia.jpg
174KB, 2350x1200px
>>76698500

Why doesn't RuAF uses those on Syria?
>>
>>76698500
I wasn't referring to any plane in particular, just any newer plane Russia might be developing - we won't hear about anything going wrong with it.
>>
>>76698539
>implying i know
but its a trainer isn't it?
>>
>>76698600
i agree
but "we" build these new planes for ourselves, we don't even sell them right now and probably will never do
>>
>>76698622

Yeah, but since IS doesn't have an air-force(if you don't include USAF lolololol) they're a pretty good and cheap option for CAS.
>>
>>76697840
>if things have gone wrong with Russian planes during the development phase, we certainly won't hear about it and they keep it hush hush
Total vs. Maybe there is much less shitstorm in media, but information appears sometimes.
>>
File: KC390.jpg (623KB, 1600x1088px) Image search: [Google]
KC390.jpg
623KB, 1600x1088px
Pls buy.
>>
File: 1493742066125.jpg (120KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
1493742066125.jpg
120KB, 1024x768px
>>76695842
France is a defeated country.

Anglo germanics won and the are eternal vasal state now.
>>
File: 1475332371234.jpg (432KB, 2028x1523px) Image search: [Google]
1475332371234.jpg
432KB, 2028x1523px
>>
File: 1497929131179.jpg (909KB, 3508x2339px) Image search: [Google]
1497929131179.jpg
909KB, 3508x2339px
>>
File: 1481615021066.jpg (34KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]
1481615021066.jpg
34KB, 640x480px
smart bombs may sell better
https://youtu.be/yPiVIqp-x70
>>
File: 1491643730689.jpg (133KB, 720x509px) Image search: [Google]
1491643730689.jpg
133KB, 720x509px
https://youtu.be/xxUv97v3di4
>>
File: 1496016924490.png (50KB, 958x505px) Image search: [Google]
1496016924490.png
50KB, 958x505px
http://psk.blog.24heures.ch/archive/2009/04/20/nac-seconde-offre1.html
>>
File: 1495987999680.jpg (155KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]
1495987999680.jpg
155KB, 1200x630px
http://www.aviatia.net/rafale-vs-eurofighter/
>>
File: 1473582325600.jpg (187KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]
1473582325600.jpg
187KB, 1200x630px
>>
File: jet fighters of 21st century.png (249KB, 957x986px) Image search: [Google]
jet fighters of 21st century.png
249KB, 957x986px
>>76702945
>>
>>76703504

Ah crap it's the one with the Mirage, my bad.
>>
>>76696691
>thé
Nice proxy pierre
>>
>>76703504
Why was Jap fighter so expensive but below average?
>>
>>76703504
>$65 million
I thought the Gripen was supposed to be cheaper compared to US and EU tech.
>>
>>76703640

Idk, heard that not even JASDF generals like it.

>>76703710

I guess the ones on pic doesn't directly compete with each other.

F-18, Rafale, Typhoon are the ones who competes against it.
>>
File: F35 takeoff.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
F35 takeoff.webm
2MB, 1280x720px
Thread posts: 63
Thread images: 21


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.