Rafales are memeplanes, even Eurofighters perform better.
>an interceptor plane perform better than a bomber
>>76695908
Arent Rafales multirole?
Plane autists should funland get f-35, gripen, eurofighter or rafale?
>>76695842
both nice looking planes.
>>76696423
SU! you could walk across and hop on one ffs
>>76696423
Gripen.
>>76696295
they look mostly like a "stealthy" bomber
LIES
I think the Rafale is a pretty plane uwu
>>76696482
So only looks like it.
What's wrong with Eurofighters? I know nothing about planes, it looks cool though.
>>76696423
Eurofighters.
>>76695842
>>76695908
>>76696295
>>76696423
>>76696453
>>76696465
>>76696474
>>76696482
>>76696488
>>76696497
>>76696529
>>76696532
>his cunt-ry is not into "battle prupen" sukhoi exclusive club
>>76696423
Rafale
>>76696610
>slavshit
*turboprops behind you*
nada pessoal menino
>>76696423
>buying thé F-35
Only if you hate yourself
>>76696631
better than merrifat and eurogay shits
>>76696423
Buy more of our Hawks pls.
new f-35 builds and f-22 > absolutetly everything
>>76696771
Yeah, they are the best at choking pilots.
>>76696423
join KFX/IFX co-operation and joint-production, build a fighter plane by your own country :)
>>76696771
>F-35
So good that several USAF bases grounded them because it kills their pilots
>>76696669
Pls buy polan, it can carry air-to-air missiles.
>>76696691
Sexy looking plane and people need to stop bullying it. Each costs not much more than some 4th generation planes now, albeit it has taken billions of dollars to get to this point yes.
>>76696837
aand that shit was fixed by LM installing a new oxygen valve
fcking russians go and continue sucking indias dick for the PAK FA money
>>76696940
Nah It's pretty pants lad
>>76696837
At least with these planes which have had international participation, these things come out in the press and people are made aware of them. Fuck knows what kind of shit is kept under wraps in Russia, no doubt lots of iffy shit.
>>76697042
From what I've read it's coming along nicely.
>>76696995
India dropped that no?
>>76696771
>>76696940
F-22 is good.
>>76697086
chicks build license copies of our planes
theyre /int/ernational too, basically you can buy a chinese SU
>>76697222
they're only going ahead with it if Russia makes a full technology transfer
of course they're being skeptical
http://www.defensenews.com/articles/indias-sukhoi-fleet-faces-problems-despite-russian-spare-parts-deal
>>76697377
Yeah those Chinks are well known to release information to everyone.
>>76697436
why not?
they're also not full clones, almost everything inside is chinese, so if you don't like something you can replace it
>>76697423
Well also heard that Russians were charging a fuckload of money.
>>76697487
I'm talking about if things have gone wrong with Russian planes during the development phase, we certainly won't hear about it and they keep it hush hush. Whereas with the F-35 it's a joint effort between nations, and these things are either released officially or leak out somehow.
>>76696423
The most cost effective one ofc. It's just a weapons platform anyway. Arm it with Meteor missiles and the Russian planes with be scrap long before they can lock on.
And then you buy the state of the art Swordfish system as well and gain the information advantage.
>>76697881
:3
>>76697840
its an old plane and its development phase mostly was over in the 80s so for this plane its not even important, its pretty stable and well tested and mature now
its a legacy plane like spitfire
im pretty sure russians don't really know how to build it from scratch themselves (its normal for legacy system btw)
>>76698500
Why doesn't RuAF uses those on Syria?
>>76698500
I wasn't referring to any plane in particular, just any newer plane Russia might be developing - we won't hear about anything going wrong with it.
>>76698539
>implying i know
but its a trainer isn't it?
>>76698600
i agree
but "we" build these new planes for ourselves, we don't even sell them right now and probably will never do
>>76698622
Yeah, but since IS doesn't have an air-force(if you don't include USAF lolololol) they're a pretty good and cheap option for CAS.
>>76697840
>if things have gone wrong with Russian planes during the development phase, we certainly won't hear about it and they keep it hush hush
Total vs. Maybe there is much less shitstorm in media, but information appears sometimes.
Pls buy.
>>76695842
France is a defeated country.
Anglo germanics won and the are eternal vasal state now.
smart bombs may sell better
https://youtu.be/yPiVIqp-x70
https://youtu.be/xxUv97v3di4
http://psk.blog.24heures.ch/archive/2009/04/20/nac-seconde-offre1.html
http://www.aviatia.net/rafale-vs-eurofighter/
>>76702945
>>76703504
Ah crap it's the one with the Mirage, my bad.
>>76696691
>thé
Nice proxy pierre
>>76703504
Why was Jap fighter so expensive but below average?
>>76703504
>$65 million
I thought the Gripen was supposed to be cheaper compared to US and EU tech.
>>76703640
Idk, heard that not even JASDF generals like it.
>>76703710
I guess the ones on pic doesn't directly compete with each other.
F-18, Rafale, Typhoon are the ones who competes against it.