India or the UK

>>76681026
India is very culturally diverse so it has an advantage there. Problem is, well much of the culture is shit, figuratively and literally.

Britain's culture is pure homosexuality. As a straight man, I'd pick India.

>>76681048
Only the south is gay

North england is top-tier

>>76681026
Us

>>76681157
North England is inbred and poverty stricken

how many designated shitting streets does London have?

>>76681476
There is Camden high street and Oxford street afaik

>>76681026
Indian """"""""""""""""""""""""culture""""""""""""""""""""""" is overrated as fuck

>>76681026
UK

indian "culture" is a meme

>>76681026
UK. Just because it's the common culture, doesn't mean it isn't culture.

>>76681026
Who cares? The world becomes homogeneous and that's wonderful

>>76681157
This

>>76681048
Fuck off to death, gipsy. You're as diverse as the chinese, you samefaced pieces of shits.

>>76684569
Why are you insulting your ancestors?

>>76684569
>Fuck off to death, gipsy
Says a Romani(an).

>>76681026
India of course. UK is turning into another pakistan. Anyway UK culture is cancer.

>>76681026
They're both wildly different culturally.

Britain has a better culture, however, as it's produced everything worth caring about.

>>76684569
lmao fucking subhuman gypsy

File: 1497137127495.jpg (234KB, 1200x595px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 1200x595px

>>76681026
Both have melded quite well, India was one of the better British conquest stories. If they just learned to shit in actual toilets they'd be fantastic allies in the Western war against Islam.