дeeп

File: soros_pride.jpg (11KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 320x180px

I wish. The truth is far less exciting.

Only subhumans hate NATO

>>76434518
Really makes you think...

>when you invade countries in order to stop them from joining a military alliance that would stop you from invading them and you're very surprised that more and more countries join said alliance

>>76440773
honestly this

File: PG_2017.05.23.nato-00-07.png (53KB, 635x417px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 635x417px

Daily reminder: only right-wing retards support Nato

>>76440773
>>76442218
Russia is worried about an offensive attack by NATO. Considering what happened to Serbia, Iraq and Libya who could blame them?

>>76442527
NATO is concerned about an offensive attack by Russia. Considering what happened to Georgia and Ukraine who could blame them?

>>76442527
It's a defensive alliance you retard. Just because NATO troops fought in those wars does not mean they were offensive wars by NATO

>>76442493
Only retards wouldn't want the military deterrence factor that NATO brings to any country. It makes invading a country as small as Albania a suicide mission for even someone like China

>>76442527
nato countries have no obligation to join offensive wars

>>76442583
Even the EU admits that Georgia was the aggressor
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/eu-report-independent-experts-blame-georgia-for-south-ossetia-war-a-650228.html

>>76442615
>It's a defensive alliance you retard. Just because NATO troops fought in those wars does not mean they were offensive wars by NATO
It literally does, retard.

>>76442680
You have to go back Ivan Sukov

>>76442680
Subhuman ossetian immigrant in Germany

>>76442695
NATO countries don't have to join a offensive war launched by any nation within it. Hence why NATO was not activated in Vietnam or Korea.

However, if a country was to attack a NATO country, EVERY country in the alliance has an obligation to support them militarily.

>>76442704
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8281990.stm
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/oct/01/russia-georgia-south-ossetia
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2009/10/geor-o02.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/30_09_09_iiffmgc_report.pdf

>>76442650
>>76442750
>Eastern European statelets wouldn't gleefully attack Russia if given the opportunity.
Contrary to all logic and reason.

>>76442750
Believe it or not, certain countries were not interested in fighting aformentioned wars. Canada comes to mind. They still got involved.

>>76442680
>Georgia started the war by attacking itself.
Sure thing, Ivan. Also:

>Der Spiegel
>credible

>>76442855
You fucking retard I've also linked BBC, the Guardian and the EU report itself

>>76442851
Yeah, but America pressured them. Not because of NATO, but because we are a fucking superpower. We have a right to do that.

>>76442888
i'll spell it out for you, Ivan:

"South Ossetia" isn't a country, it's part of Georgia, and the traitors currently residing there have no protection whatsoever by international law.

When is the USA leaving NATO like Trump promised? Maybe you can make Turkey leave also?

>>76442999
I don't think he will do it, nato without America is useless

>>76443062
A military alliance with European Countries only is way more succesful. Until now the only country that profited from Nato is America itself when they were "attacked" by Iraq.

They should pay more then they do now or fuck off.

>>76443158
>A military alliance with European Countries only is way more succesful.
history proves otherwise. euroshits are all backstabbing sissy betas.
america is the only military superpower in nato (uk is nothing without america's support and france is a joke). without america we would be defenseless

>>76443344
Okay Geert.

>>76442583
*refuses to accept in nato because no matter what russia does it remains enemy

>>76443640
stop attacking your neighbors and annexing their shit.

>>76442967
Does the same apply to Kosovo and Serbia in your mind?

>>76444388
yes, fuck those mudslimes, one albania in Europe is enough, thank you.

>>76442967
>when a separatist movement appears in Russia or another anti-western country they're freedom fighters that should be supported
>when a separatist movement appears in Georgia or another pro-western country they're traitors that should be persecuted

It's totally okay for a military alliance to act like that, but you need to be really stupid to expect your opposers to follow your hypocrisy

>>76444588
chechnya are not freedom fighters, kill them all, you're doing God's work.

see, i'm not a hypocrite at all

>>76444744
You totally forgot that both Chechnia and Georgia were parts of the Soviet Union a quarter of century ago. We're just trying to fix what the traitors did back in the 90s :^)

>>76445098
That's some Hitler-tier argument, Russia isn't the Soviet Union, get fucked

>>76448019
>Russia isn't the Soviet Union
It literally is, juridically. Changing the name doesn't make it another country.