A popular misconception in Europe is that centrist right and centrist left parties are taking immigrants in because of ideological reasons, which is false, they take them for economic reasons.
By working or abusing welfare money, immigrants spend a lot, their expanses are very beneficial to the corporations and to the state they live in, they actually don't cost more than they return.
In conclusion, immigrants help the state by a small margin (depending on how involved it is in the economy) and the corporation by a big, juicy margin. The refugee/immigrant lobby is a result of corporate interests making their way into politics.
>>76282167
What about the wealthy businessmen who start up anti-immigrant political parties while simultaneously employing primarily low-cost, low-skill immigrants, what's their endgame
>>76282167
why it can be both?
i think they use it as a europoor replacer, basically they have said it themselves (the jews) long ago
its better to replace a europoor with something even more poor and miserable