Which side will you fight for in the upcoming World War III?

>>75405722
I don't know. It seems to be we are waiting until North Korea nukes Tokyo and Seoul. After which further conflicts are unnecessary.

>>75405754
Please side with America though.

>>75405722
the one which wins.

>World War
Even China is sick of Kim's antics. The minute he launches a missile actually targeted at South Korea/Japan Pyongyang will fall by the end of the day.

Is he just wearing a blazer with no shirt?

>>75405722
>War with north korea
>WW3
it'll be vietnam 2.0 at best

>>75406037
/fa/ as fuck

>>75405722
>war between Norks and USA
>two countries
>a world war
Nah.

>>75405722
>tfw I plan to go to holydays in NK, I already made a plan, visa and all

Please wait my hend of olydays to do shit in NK

>>75406148
>WW II was also a war between Germans and Brits.
> NK vs US develops into China and possibily Russia siding with NK.

>>75406148
>war between austria-hungary and serbia
>two countries
>a world war
nah.

>>75406126
80s core


W2C kims Raf Simons blazer?

>>75406202
>china going to war with the us over fucking NK
i doubt it

>>75405722
>Which side will you fight for in the upcoming World War III?
None lol

>>75406284
not necessarily an overt participation.

>>75406307
pretty sure if the kims did something retarded china would be staying as far away from that shit as humanly possible

Why cant the world deal with the ISIS problem first before nuking each other over some land a fat little boy controls?

>>75406425
because that fat little boy wants to nuke the US and is terrifyingly close to having the ability to do so

>>75406466
>terrifyingly close
that little faggot just wants aid and you know it.

>>75406037
Imagine being so unopposed a totalitarian that you could go out tomorrow wearing socks and sandals with gym shorts and it'd immediately become the biggest fashion trend in your country.

>>75406043
This, but the one thing is that there aren't any rebel groups in NK to sponsor which is the typical MO for a situation like this. It'd be more like the Gulf.

Against China.

>>75405722
Other than krauts I hope.

War rule no.1
Don't be on the same side as Germany

>>75407113
>Don't be on the same side as Germany
i don't think they are going to partake in this festivity.

>>75405722
Allah's side, against cumskin filth

File: france-america.jpg (29KB, 400x200px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 400x200px

>>75407157
Why ;_;

>>75407037

There's no need to pretend in the internet, Chang...

Finno-uralic empire obviously

Can someone tell me why China wouldn't protect that buffer somehow? They can't just let the US kick NK's ass. It can't be in their best interest.

>>75408003
China made a huge investment in NK and NK stole it all from them and shut down what they had running.

>>75405722
not usa side :^)

>>75408775
why ;_;

The side that kills anglos

That would be north korea i guess

File: 1364659953939.gif (72KB, 600x623px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 600x623px

This planet is in desperate need of a nuclear holocaust.

test

>>75405722
No side, hopefully

>>75406202
>Russia siding with NK
Are you joking right now?

How can WW3 break out when everyone is in agreement?

>>75409829
any time any kind of conflict arises tards here will scream WORLD WAR 3

>>75405722
>will you fight
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

File: fua0808jlt1y.png (14KB, 616x606px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 616x606px

>>75405722
Commies vs. Capitalists? Coldwar 2.0 incomming.