What was the best empire for its conquered subjects?

>>74963791
No empire was good for its conquered subjects.

>>74963791
Probably American if you mean lowest amount of blood spilled

>>74963949
you mean the most

>>74964019
>A few gooks and beaners getting their melons evacuated = most

UK didn't conquer anybody, it was probably the best, most peaceful, and most benevolent empire ever.

>>74963877
Hahahahaha

>>74964163
since after the civil war to now the amount of people killed by americans or by american proxy is in the tens of millions

more than rome mongols and british combined

Woah more of that image?

>>74964295
Its literally lie.

>>74964287
Whether I like it or not. I am speaking a language which is the bastard son of the language spoken by the invasors, the romans. We now see at the Iberian runes and are unable to translate what It was written. We lost our connection with our ancestors.... They are not good for the conquered subject.

Mongols didn't try to force peoples they conquered to adopt their culture or religion, they only demanded obedience and tribute.

>>74963791
Soviet Union was good for undeveloped countries of Central Asia

>>74964529
The only good empire. Also, Finland deffending the Mongols lel.

>>74964497
I fivk romans snd drink their blood inerian brothers join me, we will all speak the last iberian language basque, this will seperate those connected to iberia and our blood and enemies.

>>74964529
Except they were horrible "houseguests" with rape and violence, and for the slightest infraction the reparation was hundredfold.