Who will win this 1 on 1 war?

The rest of the world.

>japan beat russia
>australia couldn't even beat a petty bunch of birds

>>74516372
Israel, as always.

Japan should annihilate all white people of asia tbqh

Easily Japan, although invading Australia would be a nightmare thanks to the country's sheer size and the distance between population centres

>>74516372
emus

>>74516383
Joao bringing the banter this evening...

>>74516410
Okay, enough is enough with the Jew memes. I mean the middle east shit, fine, there's a plausible connection, but what the fuck would Israel get out of Japan vs. Australia?

>>74516746
t.david goldenbankman

>>74516746
They'd finance the war by proxy on both sides and make billions

>>74517002
I want to finance a war and make billions. Like how do you even break into that market? I'm not a Jew. :(

Japan

>>74516439
>Australia is in Asia

but I will fight for Australia.

>>74516746
t. schlomo von shekelstein

I don't fight anyone except Korea

>>74516372
New Zealand.

>>74516372
Are we including the wildlife and local fauna?

>>74516372
Our emu overlord will not allow a foreign war.

>>74516372
Japanese would invade and get killed by snakes, emus, roos, abos, the sun, etc.

asymmetrical warfare in Australia would be a nightmare

>>74517115
Buy making weapons (a lot) and having a stupidly large supply of 'em as well as having plenty of parents (good luck with that lol) and being a corperate entity.

>>74518137
which is stronger russian winter general or australian weaponized fauna and flora

>>74517115
*patents

>>74517194

thank you japan you truly are my greatest ally

Aussies can beat Japan easily.
Most of Japanese youth are no loyal to their country.
Japanese national chauvinists are no more than skinny morose weebs.

We could build nukes and they can't. Plus our landmass is way more defend-able than theirs

>>74516372
the world

>>74518319
>owns nuclear power plants
>can't make nukes

it's a 1 on 1 war, why should we hold back

>>74518023
Bring it, asshole.

>Japan puts one boot on Aussie clay
>Rest of world enacts shitstorm and sanctions Japan to shit

>>74518023
come on, let's be honest
I live in korea and I know what koreans do
and korean people dont hate japan like we used to do
and we dont protest against japan like you people do against korea
we dont have any anti japanese group i dont for fucks sake why would you have one?
nowadays Japan and Korea have no reason to fight for
Dokdo is korean territory because we've got army and korean people living in that island
dont victimise yourselves like a big faggot and face the truth
i mean for fucks sake, how can you people only care about korea?
in korea, i rarely see people discussing about japan and even if they do, it's about your culture
Japan vs Korea thing must stop

Anglo union beat japan easily

>>74516372
Whoever America would defend
If I was American, I would personally destroy Australians and defend Japanese

>>74516372
Pretty sure Australia already won that war

>>74519779
this

>>74518881
>>74519729
>>74519768
ITT retards not understanding the concept of "1 on 1"

>>74516372
>cutting of Tasmania and Okinawa
Ayy

>>74520115
Well then Japan obviously
No competition

>>74520426
Tasmania is the west island of New Zealand

>>74519689
What is this thread then?

>>74520551
普通のスレじゃん
なんですぐそうやって攻撃と受け取るの? みんな普通に楽しくやってんだから空気読めよ

>>74520653
いや俺も何も本気じゃないけど
お前が言ってるそれ正にお前の事じゃない?笑

Yes they could beat us australians, but they could never defeat our emu overlords

Us, 2bh

Australia. The country itself is protected by an invisible barrier comformed by the spirit of the banter, the spirits of all the deadly fauna, and the remnants of the harsh weather of the central parts.

>>74516619
this, but Japans military is significantly stronger than Australias, as well as their economic resources.

However both countries are considered "Nuclear Latency" countries meaning they both have the resources and know how to build nukes, that could cause a problem for the rest of the world.

>>74516372
Australians are easily defeated by shitty internet connection and flightless birds so i'll say Japan

>>74516372
Australia easy, unless Japan had some covert rebuilding of its forces.

circa ww2 Australia would've been fucked without America.

Japan has samurais and giand human like robots
Australia has abos and cangoroos

>>74516746
t. Saul Goldman

>>74526667
And emus.

>>74526722
t.pekka eric auvinen

>>74519779
>>74519959
>2 rares replying between them
Totally not proxy

Japan easily, they're on the same level of tech but Japan has 100 million more population, a huge economy, and a way bigger armed forces.

File: 14767049176307.jpg (415KB, 763x2266px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 763x2266px

>mfw all the people ITT saying we'd lose

>>74527508
EMU'D

>>74527508
Kangaroos looks stronker than human.

>>74527452
>Japan only has same level of tech with beef farmers

delet now

>>74516372
>Who will win
Abos and ainus

File: jmsdf.jpg (2MB, 2000x2138px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x2138px

>>74526658
>some covert rebuilding of its forces.
even current fleet is sufficient to repel most invasions though

>>74518319
It's estimated that Japan could build nukes within months if it wanted.

File: royalausnavystrength.png (834KB, 1920x2674px) Image search: [Google]

834KB, 1920x2674px

>>74529171
All we'd need to do is sink trade ships from coming in and your country would go under in weeks since it's unsustainable on it's own unlike us.

File: 1490484175550.jpg (111KB, 764x423px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 764x423px

>>74516746

>>74529322
too few subs

>>74529322
How would you manage that when both your navy and airforce are worse?

>>74529322
We would destroy your submarines in no time though

>>74529322
Australia has a weaker air force, navy, and tank force compared japan. Yoy guys probably have better infantry tho, but im sure if japanese started training troops again, theyd be better. Plus japan has higher population and probably more manufacturing capabilities

>>74516372
probably Japan.
but they'd lose a fuck ton of resources.

>>74529500
getting built right now la

>>74530735
Built by France, the most weeb country in the world.
We will just trade them for rare pokemon cards and dakimakura

>>74516746
t. Solomon Goldbergermeister

File: P1 and P3C.jpg (57KB, 800x534px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 800x534px

>>74530735
anyway it's really pain in the ass to carry out a submarine warfare against JMSDF as it's got a formidable fleet of anti submarine aircraft as you can see on >>74529171 (basically, P1, P-3C, SH60J&K are all meant for detecting and killing subs).

>>74520516
literally take them please

>>74526570
>Nuclear Latency
But isn't most countries in the west today able to build nukes should they choose to?

>>74534047
Dunno about Japan, but Australia has massive reserves of uranium

>>74534121
Norway is one of the countries with the most thorium in the world, but we also have uranium. In fact, most countries have uranium, it's very common. But creating plutonium is another matter, but I don't think this is such a technological difficulty for western countries today. You just need to set up the practicalities and then use the theory that I'm sure all countries have access to. Maybe it's not as simple as I think it is, but hmm, if Netherlands can then why not Sweden, Norway, or other rich western countries?

>>74534395
really not an expert Tbh but I think it's a fairly complex thing
there's quite a few countries that want to go nuclear but can't manage to
>In fact, most countries have uranium, it's very common
nowhere near the scale of Australia. We have almost a third of the world's reserves here.
but yeah, it probably wouldn't make that much of a difference

File: 1401435643574.jpg (685KB, 1225x933px) Image search: [Google]

685KB, 1225x933px

>>74529322
STS Young Endeavour got This

>>74534516
I wish Norway went nuclear back sometime when we were at a crossroad. Not exactly sure when but sometime after ww2 it was determined by our politicians that we wouldn't create nukes and that we would instead go against it. Now we rely on USA all too much and without them I'm sure anyone (russia) could've bullied us as their leisure. Now if we were to start creating nukes we would incur the world's odium.

>>74534047
Yes Norway, we have so many nuclear power plants, and a large nuclear industry.

>>74534843
yeah it fucking sucks, it's a great source of energy so long as you keep on top of it

Australia is never going to be able to go nuclear either because of logistical problems. The country is too fucking big and the population is too scattered to let

>>74534121
>>74534395

japan's got shitload of plutonium as well, part of which is 'supergrade' created in fast-breeder reactors, which is more refined than usual weapons-grade. also, japan already succeeded in extracting uranium from seawater, which has 1,000x more than aggregate land deposit, at an acceptable cost.

>These plutonium stocks are large enough to manufacture more than 5,500 bombs, using an average of 8 kilograms of plutonium per bomb. Furthermore, once Japan’s Rokkasho nuclear reprocessing facility starts operating—a priority of Japan’s prime minister, Shinzo Abe—then about eight tons of plutonium each year, or enough to build almost 1,000 bombs, would be added to Japan’s already immense plutonium stockpile. According to NBC News, “Once the Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Center at Rokkasho opens, the size of this stockpile could double in five and a half years.”
>In addition, nuclear-weapons experts point out that Japan has already produced roughly 50 kilograms of “supergrade plutonium” in the natural uranium blankets of its Joyo and Monju prototype fast-breeder reactors. Once separated, it would be enough to build more than 10 bombs. In addition, because this fuel is of better quality than the usual weapons-grade plutonium, it would be easier to make smaller bombs.
http://thebulletin.org/china-worries-about-japanese-plutonium-stocks7248