How can we get Australians to cut down on their meat consumption?

>>74333997
How the fuck does a country with a 24 million population eat the same as one with a 321 million?

>>74333997
foods with lesser meat content

>>74334046
it doesn't
>per capita

>>74334046
>per capita

>>74333997
>India
>3.2kg
Are they starving over there

File: 1488546811079.jpg (43KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x500px

>>74334193
It's per capita, weighed down by the millions of slums dwellers and they have a huge part of their diet that's meat free.

not eating red meat and only eating home grown vegetables, eggs and river fish is the final redpill
maybe some grains too

>>74334126
>>74334149
haha you took my bait I was merely pretending to be retarded

>>74333997
>average Australian eats 250 grams of meat a day
>tfw the tv convinced my parents that meat is bad for you so I'd be lucky to have that much twice in a week

>>74333997
Going to be hard, considering how deeply rooted meat consumption is in our cultures here. You also have to take into account that we also expoet our quality meat all around the world, so farmers and what have you are seen as "true blue aussies, the backbone of this nation", type thing, so even if for whatever reason one wanted to reduce meat consumption here, there would be a lot of push back and also a lot of astroturfing from companies who depend on the meat trade.

It would be as difficult as getting China to cut down on pork consumption, I'd wager.

>>74334362
Last time I was watching TV there were ads promoting pork and more red meat consumption. What happened for the idiot box to start telling people meat is bad?
Feel legitimately out of the loop here.

>>74334599
Idk, apparently meat is bad for your bowels and can lead to bowel cancer if you eat too much.

Even if this is true, I would rather be eating 250g of meat a day like everyone else apparently is.

>>74333997
Why do the European Union and Russia have a dark red dot if they fall into the lighter red category?

>>74334660
No, I meat what was this all about in respect to TV? Were their ad campaigns promoting the idea that meat will give you cancer or something?

>>74333997
>European Union

im okay with this

>>74335191
>I meat
I meant*
Kek, haven't eaten anything for the past 24 hours or so and it's starting to show.

>>74335222
Kind of surprised the USA is so high. The OECD must have a very flexible definition of "meat".

>>74335191
>>74335231
Not ad campaigns, it was just a one-off segment on some tv show. Probably something ACA-tier. My parents are obsessed with bowel health though, so they were influenced quite easily I think.

>>74334193
I think I have too much to eat personally...

>>74335304
r u a fatty boi

>>74335297
Oh, righto.
My old man and step mum also decided to cut down on red meat a while back, come to think about it. I remember going over for a visit one night and being told about how meat will give you cancer or some shit, so maybe it was related to that TV show segment thing.

>>74335566
>maybe it was related to that TV show segment thing
Wouldn't be surprised 2bh

>>74335528
Used to be. I go to the gym now but I still like to overindulge.

i eat meat everyday. can't remember a dinner without meat

>>74333997

>Santiago and the North ruining chile as always

>>74336865
What do you mean huaso?

>>74336914

You can't into meat.

>>74334349
damn dude, you got me. im surprised you didn't ask how america only eat's 200lbs of meat a year

>>74333997
>european union

>>74337115
How old are you faggot? Are you the little bitch talking about the southern cone in every thread?

>>74337473
No and what does that has to do with everything?
Are you triggered by people pointing out how little meat santiago eats?