Which do you prefer?
They serve different porpoises.
plain
>>74283103
I have never been in a plane in my miserable life (29)
>>74283208
>porpoises
wat
Plane, but just if it's not in an america airline.
>>74283289
>I have never been in a plane in my miserable life (29)
>>74283289
>wat
He's from Providence faggot commie fuck off
>>74283103
I have never been in a train but planes in my shitty life
Train.
Depends on the country and where you a traveling to.
costs more to ride trains
>>74283289
planes tho
Train = diesel fumes, slow, smell the fucking shit and piss in toilets, brakes make some kind of smell
Plane = cosmic radiation, might blow up
Train is top comfy.
>>74283377
Train every time where applicable. More room, more comfort, less retarded security measures, can use mobile networks, etc.
Plane is only better when you're going really far.
Train as long as I have the time
>>74283103
High speed trains are GOAT for mid range travels.
Prove me wrong.
Love trains, but they're too expensive. I have great memories of going to Spain, Sweden, Italy, Denmark, all by night train.
But night trains are pretty much dead in Western Europe and if they exists, more expensive than a flight.
>>74283103
Trains are generaly more comfortable, and tend to stop in the middle of cities.
When you are taking the plane, you have to show up at the airport two hours before, go through the security contoll, while also having to find a way to get to the airport your going to, and a way from the airport your arriving at.
I never fly domesticaly, as the train from Oslo where I live only take ca 8h or less to each of the next 4 biggest cities in the country. Going by plane would be slightly faster, but would cost me at least twice as much.
Train. I often carry knives, 100+ml containers and enjoy staring at landscapes passing by. Also train and bus stations, unlike airports, won't x-ray you and your bag
>>74283103
sadly trains were sell to usa Jews before i was born and theres only one left in the country that you can ride. Still after travelling in europe i agree with>>74286831
>>74287890
>>74283103
To fly - plains are much better than trains.
Trains are best if it comes to navigate the tracks though...
It is difficult to make a choice. Maybe we should start with some easier question. What's better: hot girlfriend or a racing car?
>>74283103
Train for shorter distances, plane for greater distances
I have never flown but use train often dont like it very much
neither
I dont like public transportation and traveling with strange freaks mofos breathing in their bacteria contaminated air.
Never climbed a plane.
I visited Europe by train (Germany, Austria, Italy, Switzerland) and I rarely think about the plane when it comes to travelling in Europe.
>>74290224
>I rarely think about the plane when it comes to travelling in Europe.
That's nice and all when you're traving relative short distances.
I take the plane when ever I'm going anywhere south of Denmark.
I go to work by train desu, it's very convenient. Plane is meant for greater distances.
>he can't go wherever he likes whenever he likes
>>74290740
>he can't go wherever he likes whenever he likes by using a well developed public transport system
>>74290740
I use both my car and public transports, it all depends on where and how far I'm going
400 miles and up = plane
everything else that's more than walking distance = train
public transportation are for those without a driver license
>>74283103
Trains are comfy day to day transportation devices, planes are for travelling to distant location. Apples and oranges really.