Which is objectively better and why? Would I get beheaded in Argentine or run over in France being blanco and all?
Where are my /you/s you faggots???
French is objectively better. Spanish is spicshit
>>74160311
If you want to visit France, Africa and the South Pacific, learn French.
If you want to visit Spain or Latin American countries (Colombia, Argentina, USA, etc), learn Spanish.
It's not hard.
>>74160723
What if I want to visit Spanish speaking countries, but also am into French literature? What do given the circumstances? In all honesty, I'd love to learn both but gotta choose one thing at a time.
>>74160849
Get interested in spanish literature instead?
>>74160897
Aside from Don Quixote, no such thing. Shit-tier not included.
>>74160849
Learn Spanish If you want to visit Spanish-speaking countries. You can always read Rimbaud in a language you understand, and later read him in the original French. Or use a dictionary. But you need at least some spoken Spanish if you must interact with people.
>>74160939
Read some of the worck of Gabriel García Márquez. It is very good.
>>74161024
No, it isn't.
>>74160311
Learn both. Similar grammar structure, massive resources and very valuable. I grew up in Texas so Spanish is easy for me. My secondary concentration in college was French, you know more than you think. Both is the best answer.
In South America, French is common after English and the locals like speaking it.
garcia marquez is no proust
England is better than both, wrekt both of em at Trafalgar, froggies and beaners couldn't compete
>>74160939
>Philistine Ukrainian
Wow, what a surprise
>>74164371
If you think I'm philistine then you're deeply wrong.
>>74160311
Spanish is easier to learn and more useful, as it has more native speakers than even English.